af5f475e   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
      
   On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:16:29 -0700 (PDT), Rupert    
   wrote:   
      
   >On Oct 24, 12:09 am, dh@. wrote:   
   >> On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 14:16:14 -0700, Just Say No  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >It's one thing to eliminate animal slime/protein from your diet, and   
   >> >substitute vegetable slime/protein. There must be a major difference   
   >> >between the two types of slimes.   
   >>   
   >> >But to claim that you are avoiding doing harm to animals and it is   
   >> >founded on the principal of ahimsa is total bullshit.   
   >>   
   >>   Vegans contribute to the deaths of animals by their use of   
   >> wood and paper products, electricity, roads and all types of   
   >> buildings, their own diet, etc... just as everyone else does.   
   >> What they try to avoid are products which provide life   
   >> (and death) for farm animals, but even then they would have   
   >> to avoid the following items containing animal by-products   
   >> in order to be successful:   
   >>   
   >> tires, paper, upholstery, floor waxes, glass, water   
   >> filters, rubber, fertilizer, antifreeze, ceramics, insecticides,   
   >> insulation, linoleum, plastic, textiles, blood factors, collagen,   
   >> heparin, insulin, solvents, biodegradable detergents, herbicides,   
   >> gelatin capsules,  adhesive tape, laminated wood products,   
   >> plywood, paneling, wallpaper and wallpaper paste, cellophane   
   >> wrap and tape, abrasives, steel ball bearings   
   >>   
   >>     The meat industry provides life for the animals that it   
   >> slaughters, and the animals live and die as a result of it   
   >> as animals do in other habitats. They also depend on it for   
   >> their lives as animals do in other habitats. If people consume   
   >> animal products from animals they think are raised in decent   
   >> ways, they will be promoting life for more such animals in the   
   >> future. People who want to contribute to decent lives for   
   >> livestock with their lifestyle must do it by being conscientious   
   >> consumers of animal products, because they can not do it by   
   >> being vegan.   
   >>     From the life and death of a thousand pound grass raised   
   >> steer and whatever he happens to kill during his life, people   
   >> get over 500 pounds of human consumable meat...that's well   
   >> over 500 servings of meat. From a grass raised dairy cow people   
   >> get thousands of dairy servings. Due to the influence of farm   
   >> machinery, and *icides, and in the case of rice the flooding and   
   >> draining of fields, one serving of soy or rice based product is   
   >> likely to involve more animal deaths than hundreds of servings   
   >> derived from grass raised animals.   
   >   
   >We examined the evidence for this assertion in the past, and found it   
   >was totally unsubstantiated. You should stop saying it.   
      
       I believe it's true, and you should start saying it.   
      
   >> Grass raised animal products   
   >> contribute to fewer wildlife deaths, better wildlife habitat, and   
   >> better lives for livestock than soy or rice products.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)