8f91c61c   
   1f55a51d   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
   From: rupertmccallum@yahoo.com   
      
   On Oct 27, 9:20 pm, "Mr.Smartypants"    
   wrote:   
   > On Oct 27, 5:23 am, Rupert  wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > > On Oct 26, 9:15 pm, "Mr.Smartypants"    
   > > wrote:   
   >   
   > > > On Oct 26, 2:59 am, Rupert  wrote:   
   >   
   > > > > On Oct 25, 8:05 pm, "Mr.Smartypants"    
   > > > > wrote:   
   >   
   > > > > > On Oct 25, 2:38 am, Rupert  wrote:   
   >   
   > > > > > > On Oct 25, 8:27 am, "Mr.Smartypants"    
   > > > > > > wrote:   
   >   
   > > > > > > > On Oct 24, 2:05 pm, George Plimpton  wrote:   
   >   
   > > > > > > > > On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, dh@. wrote:   
   >   
   > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert   
      
   > > > > > > > > > wrote:   
   >   
   > > > > > > > > >> On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > >>>      So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried   
   to wuss it off as   
   > > > > > > > > >>> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's   
   original post which Goo   
   > > > > > > > > >>> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the   
   Goober's sorrow. It seems   
   > > > > > > > > >>> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater   
   forging anything considering   
   > > > > > > > > >>> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little   
   things regarding the   
   > > > > > > > > >>> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big   
   thing were not itself a   
   > > > > > > > > >>> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?   
   >   
   > > > > > > > > >> It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a   
   forgery.   
   >   
   > > > > > > > > >      If so then why does he lie about little things   
   >   
   > > > > > > > > I don't.   
   >   
   > > > > > > > > You knew all along that Slater forged the post.   
   >   
   > > > > > > > apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original   
   post,   
   > > > > > > > Wussypussy?   
   >   
   > > > > > > Ball provided a link to the original post in a previous thread.   
   >   
   > > > > > there's no proof it's the original. Goo used to delete many of his   
   > > > > > posts when these groups were on Deja News.   
   >   
   > > > > Well, it is a post made by Ball, and Slater's post is a modified   
   > > > > version of it.   
   >   
   > > > Yeh, and Goo's post might be the 2nd of it's kind.   
   >   
   > > Does that strike you as a plausible hypothesis?   
   >   
   > Given that Goo has a history of revising posts to suit his agenda and   
   > a history of deleting posts that he's ashamed of, I'm open to any   
   > scenario including the one I theorized.   
      
   Do you think it has a probability greater than 0.01?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)