1f55a51d   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
      
   On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:20:32 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Oct 27, 5:23 am, Rupert  wrote:   
   >> On Oct 26, 9:15 pm, "Mr.Smartypants"    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> > On Oct 26, 2:59 am, Rupert  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > > On Oct 25, 8:05 pm, "Mr.Smartypants"    
   >> > > wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > > > On Oct 25, 2:38 am, Rupert  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > > > > On Oct 25, 8:27 am, "Mr.Smartypants"    
   >> > > > > wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > > > > > On Oct 24, 2:05 pm, George Plimpton  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > > > > > > On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, dh@. wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert   
      
   >> > > > > > > > wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > > > > > > >> On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:   
   >> > > > > > > >>>      So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried   
   to wuss it off as   
   >> > > > > > > >>> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's   
   original post which Goo   
   >> > > > > > > >>> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the   
   Goober's sorrow. It seems   
   >> > > > > > > >>> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging   
   anything considering   
   >> > > > > > > >>> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little   
   things regarding the   
   >> > > > > > > >>> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big   
   thing were not itself a   
   >> > > > > > > >>> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?   
   >>   
   >> > > > > > > >> It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.   
   >>   
   >> > > > > > > >      If so then why does he lie about little things   
   >>   
   >> > > > > > > I don't.   
   >>   
   >> > > > > > > You knew all along that Slater forged the post.   
   >>   
   >> > > > > > apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original   
   post,   
   >> > > > > > Wussypussy?   
   >>   
   >> > > > > Ball provided a link to the original post in a previous thread.   
   >>   
   >> > > > there's no proof it's the original. Goo used to delete many of his   
   >> > > > posts when these groups were on Deja News.   
   >>   
   >> > > Well, it is a post made by Ball, and Slater's post is a modified   
   >> > > version of it.   
   >>   
   >> > Yeh, and Goo's post might be the 2nd of it's kind.   
   >>   
   >> Does that strike you as a plausible hypothesis?   
   >   
   >   
   >Given that Goo has a history of revising posts to suit his agenda and   
   >a history of deleting posts that he's ashamed of, I'm open to any   
   >scenario including the one I theorized.   
      
       I don't believe there's a trick that could be so dishonest as to be below   
   the Goober trying to get away with it. What could be? LOL...certainly not lying   
   about ruining his own dining room floor because he's an idiot. But would Goo   
   really stoop to blaming it on cats? LOL...of course he would. And we KNOW Goo   
   lies about his own quotes frequently.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)