e4f2b291   
   XPost: alt.creative+cooking, alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.food.cooking   
      
   On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:44:53 -0700 (PDT), Rupert    
   wrote:   
      
   >On Oct 24, 9:50 pm, dh@. wrote:   
   >> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:19:11 -0700 (PDT), Rupert    
   >> wrote:   
   >> >On Oct 24, 12:32 am, dh@. wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> Probably what would be best would be to learn what percentage of which   
   type   
   >> >> animals are killed by growing soy. Then by cows eating grass. Even   
   though it   
   >> >> seems obvious the number would be much lower for the cattle, you could   
   never   
   >> >> learn to appreciate it or probably even accept it. It would probably be   
   another   
   >> >> one of those things your brain can only interpret as "nonsense".   
   >>   
   >> >You've got to take into account the death of the cow when it is   
   >> >slaughtered as well.   
   >>   
   >>     With the cow its life and death both need to be considered, while with   
   the   
   >> CDs only their deaths since they weren't raised deliberately to be killed   
   for   
   >> human food production. And remember that even you have once in a while felt   
   the   
   >> lives of some grass raised cattle might be "good".   
   >   
   >Your original remark was "It [seitan] almost certainly involves more   
   >animal deaths than grass raised beef". This remark was unfounded.   
      
       It could only be untrue if there are no wildlife to speak of in the soy   
   fields.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)