cfe38cde
XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
From: rupertmccallum@yahoo.com
On 29 Okt., 23:03, dh@. wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:38:52 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Oct 24, 9:36 pm, dh@. wrote:
> >> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:
> >> >> So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
> >> >> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post
which Goo
> >> >> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow.
It seems
> >> >> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything
considering
> >> >> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding
the
> >> >> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not
itself a
> >> >> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>
> >> >It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.
>
> >> If so then why does Goo lie about little things if the big thing is not
> >> itself a lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>
> >What has he lied about?
>
> For one thing Goo lied that I told you I knew Slater forged it, when of
> course I still don't know that and in fact it's looking more and more like he
> didn't as time goes along. If you're going to try to help the Goober lie
about
> this (imo of course because of your admiration for him) then you need to
present
> the evidence for it that Goo has been completely unable to attempt
presenting.
> What Goo's trying to do is wuss away from it for however long he waits, and
then
> he'll begin lying that it's already been presented and hilariously suggest
that
> we go back and try to find it for him. Why do you want to support Goo's lie
> about this particular thing anyway, do you know?
I don`t wish to support anything Ball has said. I simply asked you a
question.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
