XPost: alt.creative+cooking, alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.   
   port.football.college   
   XPost: rec.food.cooking   
      
   On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:30:52 -0700, Dutch  wrote:   
      
   >dh@. wrote:   
   >>      IF you honestly favor AW over elimination   
   >   
   >Those are not the alternatives, you are collapsing two decisions into   
   >one. By doing so you make your argument nonsensical.   
   >   
   >1. I favor continuation (of livestock breeding) over elimination (of   
   >domestic livestock species).   
   >   
   >2. I favor "AW" over neglect of animal needs or outright abuse.   
   >   
   >People who do not say yes to 1. are not faced with  decision 2. at all.   
   >They cannot be accused of "not supporting AW", because, first, their   
   >lifestyles don't introduce the possibility of animal neglect or abuse,   
   >and secondly, they may well be an advocate and supporter of "AW" by   
   >means of deliberate third party actions, which many are.   
   >   
   >Of course you've seen this indisputable argument a hundred times at   
   >least and you never get it, so you won't now.   
      
       Of course I do get it which is why I say they don't support it with their   
   lifestlye which they don't. Try explaining why you want people to think they   
   would contribute to things through financial donations that they deliberately   
   avoid contributing to with their lifestyle.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)