36921b2c   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
   From: rupertmccallum@yahoo.com   
      
   On Nov 1, 4:49 pm, dh@. wrote:   
   > On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:15:14 -0700 (PDT), Rupert    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > >On 29 Okt., 23:03, dh@. wrote:   
   > >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:38:52 -0700 (PDT), Rupert    
   > >> wrote:   
   > >> >On Oct 24, 9:36 pm, dh@. wrote:   
   > >> >> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert    
   > >> >> wrote:   
   >   
   > >> >> >On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:   
   > >> >> >> So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off   
   as   
   > >> >> >> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original   
   post which Goo   
   > >> >> >> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's   
   sorrow. It seems   
   > >> >> >> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging   
   anything considering   
   > >> >> >> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things   
   regarding the   
   > >> >> >> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were   
   not itself a   
   > >> >> >> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?   
   >   
   > >> >> >It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.   
   >   
   > >> >> If so then why does Goo lie about little things if the big thing is not   
   > >> >> itself a lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?   
   >   
   > >> >What has he lied about?   
   >   
   > >> For one thing Goo lied that I told you I knew Slater forged it, when of   
   > >> course I still don't know that and in fact it's looking more and more   
   like he   
   > >> didn't as time goes along. If you're going to try to help the Goober lie   
   about   
   > >> this (imo of course because of your admiration for him) then you need to   
   present   
   > >> the evidence for it that Goo has been completely unable to attempt   
   presenting.   
   > >> What Goo's trying to do is wuss away from it for however long he waits,   
   and then   
   > >> he'll begin lying that it's already been presented and hilariously   
   suggest that   
   > >> we go back and try to find it for him. Why do you want to support Goo's   
   lie   
   > >> about this particular thing anyway, do you know?   
   >   
   > >I don`t wish to support anything Ball has said. I simply asked you a   
   > >question.   
   >   
   >     You questioned him about it before, which of course was/is a surprise to   
   me.   
   > Maybe he scolded you for it through email?   
      
   Of course not; don't be stupid.   
      
   > He also lied that he hasn't been   
   > asked about his pissing in the past.   
      
   Did he; where did he say that?   
      
   > He also lied that it didn't take him a   
   > while to come up with his story about Slater. So it seems likely enough he's   
   > lying about the cats too since he's lying about everything else.   
      
   May this belief of yours bring you joy.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)