712e6b1e
XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
From: rupertmccallum@yahoo.com
On Nov 5, 9:57 pm, dh@. wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:16:38 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Nov 1, 4:49 pm, dh@. wrote:
> >> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:15:14 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
> >> wrote:
> >> >On 29 Okt., 23:03, dh@. wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:38:52 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >On Oct 24, 9:36 pm, dh@. wrote:
> >> >> >> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert
> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:
> >> >> >> >> So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it
off as
> >> >> >> >> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original
post which Goo
> >> >> >> >> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's
sorrow. It seems
> >> >> >> >> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging
anything considering
> >> >> >> >> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things
regarding the
> >> >> >> >> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing
were not itself a
> >> >> >> >> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>
> >> >> >> >It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.
>
> >> >> >> If so then why does Goo lie about little things if the big thing is
not
> >> >> >> itself a lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>
> >> >> >What has he lied about?
>
> >> >> For one thing Goo lied that I told you I knew Slater forged it, when of
> >> >> course I still don't know that and in fact it's looking more and more
like he
> >> >> didn't as time goes along. If you're going to try to help the Goober
lie about
> >> >> this (imo of course because of your admiration for him) then you need
to present
> >> >> the evidence for it that Goo has been completely unable to attempt
presenting.
> >> >> What Goo's trying to do is wuss away from it for however long he
waits, and then
> >> >> he'll begin lying that it's already been presented and hilariously
suggest that
> >> >> we go back and try to find it for him. Why do you want to support
Goo's lie
> >> >> about this particular thing anyway, do you know?
>
> >> >I don`t wish to support anything Ball has said. I simply asked you a
> >> >question.
>
> >> You questioned him about it before, which of course was/is a surprise to
me.
> >> Maybe he scolded you for it through email?
>
> >Of course not;
>
> Of course that's what you would say if he did, and we know it.
>
Why do you suppose that would be?
> >don't be stupid.
>
> LOL...it would be stupid if I didn't take that possibility into
> consideration since from my pov it seems as or more likely than not.
>
> >> He also lied that he hasn't been
> >> asked about his pissing in the past.
>
> >Did he; where did he say that?
>
> He lied about it and Ron pointed out that he was lying. Do you want to
think
> he's too honest to lie about that or what?
>
> >> He also lied that it didn't take him a
> >> while to come up with his story about Slater. So it seems likely enough
he's
> >> lying about the cats too since he's lying about everything else.
>
> >May this belief of yours bring you joy.
>
> Goo's the one creating the impression that he lied about the cats by
lying
> about other things. I'm just going by the Goober's lies, and now also the
things
> you apparently don't want to believe your hero (Goo) is lying about.
And you find the issue interesting?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
