b5c7215a   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
   From: rupertmccallum@yahoo.com   
      
   On Nov 14, 7:26 pm, Derek  wrote:   
   > On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:19:22 -0800 (PST), Rupert    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > >On Nov 14, 6:57 pm, Derek  wrote:   
   > >> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 02:34:00 -0800 (PST), Rupert    
   > >> wrote:   
   >   
   > >> []   
   >   
   > >> >> >So what you're saying is that you think that Ball probably   
   > >> >> >deliberately pissed on his floor and then posted to usenet about it?   
   >   
   > >> >>     If he did the pissing he was probably so wasted when he did it the   
   first few   
   > >> >> times that he didn't realise what he was doing, and later figured it   
   out but   
   > >> >> kept doing it since it had already been done several times.... Then he   
   got in   
   > >> >> the habit of it for a while until one day the smell got so bad that he   
   decided   
   > >> >> to finally quit doing it, and then later found out how much trouble he   
   set   
   > >> >> himself up for trying to get it to quit stinking. It makes more sense   
   than that   
   > >> >> cats had done it years ago or whatever and Goo just noticed it one day   
   after   
   > >> >> having lived there for however long. We know Goo lies about his own   
   quotes as or   
   > >> >> more often than not...at least I'm aware of it even if you honestly   
   aren't. We   
   > >> >> know Goo lied about it not taking a while for him to respond, Goo lied   
   about   
   > >> >> having been asked about the issue in the past, and Goo lied about me   
   having told   
   > >> >> you I knew Slater forged what he presented. Why would Goo lie about   
   those things   
   > >> >> if he's not lying about the cats? Why???   
   >   
   > >> >First of all   
   >   
   > >> How can you waste a single moment responding to that nonsense and not feel   
   > >> debased in some small way, Rupert? What the fuck's the matter with you?   
   >   
   > >Good question, really. I agree with you.   
   >   
   > Well, if it's any consolation to you, I've found myself involved in a lot   
   > worse.   
      
   Well, responding to David Harrison is a pretty silly habit, but I   
   suppose one could think of habits that are more harmful.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)