XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
      
   On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:49:04 -0800, Goo agreed:   
      
   >On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:47:30 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 02:34:00 -0800 (PST), Rupert    
   >>wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Nov 13, 10:42 pm, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>> On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:09:39 -0800 (PST), Rupert    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>> >On Nov 6, 6:02 pm, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>> >> On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 04:27:42 -0800 (PST), Rupert    
   >>>> >> wrote:   
   >>>> >> >On Nov 5, 9:57 pm, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>> >> >> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:16:38 -0700 (PDT), Rupert    
   >>>> >> >> wrote:   
   >>>> >> >> >On Nov 1, 4:49 pm, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>> >> >> >> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:15:14 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <   
   upertmccal...@yahoo.com>   
   >>>> >> >> >> wrote:   
   >>>> >> >> >> >On 29 Okt., 23:03, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:38:52 -0700 (PDT), Rupert   
      
   >>>> >> >> >> >> wrote:   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >On Oct 24, 9:36 pm, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert   
      
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to   
   wuss it off as   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's   
   original post which Goo   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the   
   Goober's sorrow. It seems   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater   
   forging anything considering   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little   
   things regarding the   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big   
   thing were not itself a   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a   
   forgery.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >> If so then why does Goo lie about little things if the big   
   thing is not   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >> itself a lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> >What has he lied about?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> For one thing Goo lied that I told you I knew Slater forged   
   it, when of   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> course I still don't know that and in fact it's looking more   
   and more like he   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> didn't as time goes along. If you're going to try to help the   
   Goober lie about   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> this (imo of course because of your admiration for him) then   
   you need to present   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> the evidence for it that Goo has been completely unable to   
   attempt presenting.   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> What Goo's trying to do is wuss away from it for however long   
   he waits, and then   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> he'll begin lying that it's already been presented and   
   hilariously suggest that   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> we go back and try to find it for him. Why do you want to   
   support Goo's lie   
   >>>> >> >> >> >> about this particular thing anyway, do you know?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> >> >I don`t wish to support anything Ball has said. I simply asked   
   you a   
   >>>> >> >> >> >question.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> >> You questioned him about it before, which of course was/is a   
   surprise to me.   
   >>>> >> >> >> Maybe he scolded you for it through email?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> >Of course not;   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> Of course that's what you would say if he did, and we know it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >Why do you suppose that would be?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> Because you wouldn't want me to think you're both on the same team as   
   I do,   
   >>>> >> and that you sometimes discuss things through email.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >If Ball took it into his head to email me for whatever reason, that   
   >>>> >would not mean that "we sometimes discuss things through email",   
   >>>>   
   >>>>     It seems most likely that you do though, from my pov.   
   >>>   
   >>>Your point of view lacks rational foundation.   
   >>   
   >>    It sure does have.   
   >>   
   >>>Ball [Goo] and I have never had any email exchanges, and you have no good   
   >>>reason for thinking otherwise.   
   >>   
   >>    I do have reason since I consider you two to be on the same side.   
   >>   
   >>>> >unless I chose to reply to him, and it would not mean that I have any   
   >>>> >motivation to conceal the fact from you.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>     From my position you both appear to be eliminationists, but Goo is   
   lying   
   >>>> about it and attempting very poorly to pretend to be a misnomer opponent   
   instead   
   >>>> of what he actually is. However, his attempt is so very pathetic that   
   from my   
   >>>> pov Goo clearly appears to be a misnomer supporter who is lying about it.   
   You   
   >>>> appear to be one who is honest about it to whatever degree, but you're not   
   >>>> honest enough to admit you and the Goober are on the same side and working   
   >>>> together. Doing that would work against the whole idea, and you would   
   never do   
   >>>> it unless possibly at some point you become an AW supporter INSTEAD OF an   
   >>>> eliminationist and then you and Goo would be on opposing sides and you   
   would   
   >>>> then have reason to feel good about exposing Goo, but so far you don't.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>You've lost touch with reality.   
   >>   
   >>    IF you had good reason to expose Goo now you would do so, meaning that   
   you   
   >>don't. IF you ever move on to an AW position instead of an elimination   
   position   
   >>THEN you would have good reason to expose the Goober, but not unless that   
   >>happens which seems unlikely.   
   >>   
   >>>> >> >> >don't be stupid.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> LOL...it would be stupid if I didn't take that possibility into   
   >>>> >> >> consideration since from my pov it seems as or more likely than not.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> >> He also lied that he hasn't been   
   >>>> >> >> >> asked about his pissing in the past.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> >Did he; where did he say that?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> He lied about it and Ron pointed out that he was lying. Do you want   
   to think   
   >>>> >> >> he's too honest to lie about that or what?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> >> He also lied that it didn't take him a   
   >>>> >> >> >> while to come up with his story about Slater. So it seems likely   
   enough he's   
   >>>> >> >> >> lying about the cats too since he's lying about everything else.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> >May this belief of yours bring you joy.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >> Goo's the one creating the impression that he lied about the cats   
   by lying   
   >>>> >> >> about other things. I'm just going by the Goober's lies, and now   
   also the things   
   >>>> >> >> you apparently don't want to believe your hero (Goo) is lying about.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> >And you find the issue interesting?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >> I was curious about what I remembered to begin with, and now I'm   
   curious   
   >>>> >> about why Goo lied about some of the things he lied about. Why make up   
   >>>> >> unecessary lies about things that don't really matter if he's not   
   lying about   
   >>>> >> the main issue?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> >So what you're saying is that you think that Ball [Goo] probably   
   >>>> >deliberately pissed on his floor and then posted to usenet about it?   
   >>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)