XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.sport.football.college,   
   rec.food.cooking   
   XPost: alt.gothic   
      
   On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:28:26 -0800, Goo wrote:   
      
   >On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:58:30 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:52:13 -0800, Goo wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>It means only "existence" when you use it, Goo.   
   >>   
   >>"I eat meat." - Goo   
   >>   
   >>"NO livestock benefit from being farmed." - Goo   
   >>   
   >>"No farm animals benefit from farming." - Goo   
   >>   
   >>""giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of   
   >>their deaths" - Goo   
   >>   
   >>"the nutritionally unnecessary choice deliberately to kill an animal   
   >>ALWAYS causes a moral harm greater in magnitude than . . . the   
   >>moral "benefit" realized by the animal in existing at all" - Goo   
   >>   
   >>"the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude   
   >>than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Goo   
   >>   
   >>"no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing   
   >>of the animals erases all of it." - Goo   
   >>   
   >>"it is not "better" that the animal exist, no matter   
   >>its quality of live" - Goo   
   >   
   >All true statements, Goober Fuckwit.   
      
       Sometimes you act like you want to disagree with yourself about them Goober   
   and sometimes you confess that you agree with yourself about them. But one   
   thing   
   you have never been able to do is explain how you think you disagree with   
   yourself about any of them. You and all eliminationists agree with you(rself)   
   about ALL OF IT, Goo.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)