XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:02:36 -0800, Goo wrote:   
      
   >when he attempts to make a more principled   
   >ethical attack against it, he fails utterly.   
      
       Goober I suggest that people give the animals' lives as much or more   
   consideration than their deaths and you oppose the suggestion ONLY because   
   doing   
   so works against elimination. YOU have proven that's the only reason Goo by the   
   fact that in all these years you STILL have not been able to say how you want   
   people to believe anti-consideration is superior to having consideration other   
   than the fact that anti-consideration favors elimination and ONLY elimination.   
   So to people who honestly favor decent AW over elimination your   
   anti-consideration is very much INFERIOR to having consideration, and between   
   all of you misnomer huggers you can't even attempt to pretend that it's not.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)