XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:18:57 -0700, Bob Casanova  wrote:   
      
   >On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:20:07 -0500, the following appeared   
   >in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:   
   >   
   >>On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:20:48 -0700, Bob Casanova  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:29:42 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:57:35 -0700, Bob Casanova  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:23:34 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:13:44 -0700, Bob Casanova  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:59:29 -0500, the following appeared   
   >>>>>>>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:39:35 -0700, Bob Casanova    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:52:11 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:13:01 -0700, Bob Casanova    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:41:22 -0500, the following appeared   
   >>>>>>>>>>>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:49:32 -0700, Bob Casanova    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:59:53 -0400, the following appeared   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:26:24 -0700, Bob Casanova <   
   ospam@buzz.off> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:42:55 -0400, the following appeared   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    I challenge you to try to help the Goober and/or "Bob"   
   and/or yourself try   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to explain what you think is preventing you from benefitting   
   from your life. Go:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Already been done, multiple times.  And just as above, you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>snipped the explanation and pretended it didn't exist.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You're an idiot.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>    Try presenting an example if you think you're aware of one.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>No examples exist of "benefitting solely from life", which   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>is the point. Try to keep up, even if you are an idiot.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>    LOL!!! You proved yourself a liar then.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>You   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>    I was hoping you could at least attempt to pretend you have some   
   clue what   
   >>>>>>>>>>you want people to think is preventing you from benefitting from   
   your life, but   
   >>>>>>>>>>you've proven to have no clue what you want people to think is   
   preventing you.   
   >>>>>>>>>>That is YOUR fault. You can't support your own claim.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>I've abandoned the effort to educate him in this thread.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>    LOL!!! You don't have any idea what you think you're trying to   
   talk about. I   
   >>>>>>>>knew it from the start, and now you've made it clear that you also   
   finally found   
   >>>>>>>>out you don't have any idea. Hilarious!   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Whatever you say, Sparky. Continue to wallow in ignorance;   
   >>>>>>>it suits you.   
   >   
   >>>>>>   You're right about that anyway.   
   >   
   >>>There, fixed it for you again. You're welcome.   
   >   
   >>>>    You've had some time now.   
   >   
   >>>Yep   
   >   
   >>>>Do you think you can finally try to explain what   
   >>>>you think is preventing your life from being an advantage to you yet? Or   
   are you   
   >>>>still completely unable to even make an attempt as you have been all along?   
   >   
   >>>, but you continue to wallow in ignorance. So be it.   
   >   
   >>    It's your fault because you can't attempt to back up your claim   
   >   
   >I'm not making a claim;   
      
       You sure are. You're claiming that life is NOT a benefit, but you can't   
   make   
   any attempt to back it up. You can't even pretend to have any idea what   
   prevents   
   it from being.   
      
   >you are. You claim that "life is a   
   >benefit". You provide zero evidence in support of that   
   >claim,   
      
       The fact that when you lose your life you will no longer be able to benefit   
   from anything proves that it's a benefit that makes all others possible.   
      
   >and it's up to you, not me, to support it.   
      
       It's up to you to support your claim that it's not a benefit, which would   
   require you saying what you want people to think prevents it from being, which   
   you're totally unable to attempt to do.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)