f9834858   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.sport.football.college,   
   rec.food.cooking   
   XPost: alt.gothic   
   From: rupertmccallum@yahoo.com   
      
   On Dec 16, 5:37 pm, George Plimpton  wrote:   
   > On 12/16/2012 1:57 AM, Rupert wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   > > On Dec 16, 5:30 am, George Plimpton  wrote:   
   > >> On 12/15/2012 4:09 PM, Lord Infomouse wrote:   
   >   
   > >>> On 12/15/2012 4:17 PM, George Plimpton wrote:   
   > >>>> On 12/15/2012 2:18 PM, Lord Infomouse wrote:   
   > >>>>> On 12/15/2012 10:37 AM, George Plimpton wrote:   
   > >>>>>> On 12/13/2012 12:27 PM, dh@. wrote:   
   > >>>>>> Not for you it isn't - you can't give any valid assumptions.   
   >   
   > >>>>>>> As long as the being wishes to remain alive life is of positive   
   > >>>>>>> value.   
   >   
   > >>>>>> *FAIL*.  No livestock animal "wishes" anything.   
   >   
   > >>>>> This is a baseless assertion which you cannot prove.  Additionally, I   
   > >>>>> claim it is false.   
   >   
   > >>>> You know that it is true.  You know that no non-human animal "wishes"   
   > >>>> for anything.  Everyone knows it.   
   >   
   > >>> It's not hard.   
   >   
   > >> You're right, it isn't.  Non-human animals don't "wish".  Every thinking   
   > >> person knows this.  Assuming you're a thinking person, you know it, too.   
   >   
   > > Complete nonsense.   
   >   
   > No, it isn't.   
      
   It certainly appears to be complete nonsense to me. You may think   
   differently. I suppose, if you feel inclined, you can attempt to argue   
   the point.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)