XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.sport.football.college,   
   rec.food.cooking   
   XPost: alt.gothic   
      
   On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:09:30 -0800, Dutch  wrote:   
      
   >Lord Infomouse wrote:   
   >> On 12/24/2012 2:30 PM, dh@. wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>      They do Goob, even though they're not aware of the position   
   >>> they're in.   
   >>> LOL...and that particular fact is a very significant part OF their pov   
   >>> Goo. If   
   >>> they were aware of their own position it would be a lot different but   
   >>> they're   
   >>> not and you couldn't make them aware of it even if you tried, Goober.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> It's just very surprising that he would admit he doesn't care about   
   >>>>> the animals.   
   >>>>> I expect him to try lying that he actually does at some point, but   
   >>>>> then again he   
   >>>>> might be afraid to say anything more about it at all. No doubt he   
   >>>>> doesn't want   
   >>>>> to and that's why you being his brother have taken over for his lame   
   >>>>> ass. You   
   >>>>> people are pathetic Goob...amusing, but pathetic.   
   >>   
   >> Part of the problem that I see is that you have made Goober and Rupert   
   >> both your enemies, where Rupert is clearly much smarter than Goober and   
   >> more adept at argument.  Goober likes to declare his opinion as fact and   
   >> a lot of people know that he is wrong.  Rupert is just afraid to commit   
   >> to any term or phrase that hasn't been laid out well.   
   >   
   >Everybody who bothers to figure out what a load of bullshit he's pushing   
   >is his enemy.   
      
       Rupert is bullshitting by claiming he can't comprehend the distinction   
   between lives of positive and negative value imo. If not then he's mentally   
   restricted in ways that no one in my sixth grade class was, since we all could   
   do it in sixth grade. Since he's an eliminationist we know he like yourself is   
   a   
   maniacal extremist. He takes the extreme of wanting to see all domestic animals   
   eliminated, yet can't comprehend a distinction between lives of positive and   
   negative value so he claims. That means he can't appreciate any distinction   
   between the value of life for livestock, humans, pets, or wildlife. IF that's   
   really the case then since he wants to see domestic animals eliminated and   
   can't   
   appreciate any distinction between the value of life for them and wildlife it   
   seems he should also want the elimination of wildlife too. Since he can't   
   appreciate any distinction between the value of life for livestock and humans   
   he   
   should also want the elimination of humans. Etc...   
      
       Goo lies that I'm a convicted felon. Goo lies that I don't consider quality   
   of life. Goo lies that I don't appreciate life for billions of livestock   
   animals. Goo claims life is not the benefit it so clearly appears to be, yet   
   can't even begin to pretend he has any clue what could prevent it from being   
   one   
   (though he's revealed that he thinks it has something to do with the   
   pre-existent state). Goo claims to oppose the misnomer yet can never produce   
   any   
   of his supposed opposition. Goo has suggested that there are multiple Ruperts   
   yet can't even pretend to explain what he thought he was trying to talk about.   
   Goo has insisted that some livestock are raised for no other reason than to   
   become pet food. Goo has lied that he was a Marine. Goo has lied more than once   
   that he has a PhD. Goo has dishonestly pretended to be dozens of different   
   people, often supporting and praising himselves while doing so. Etc...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)