XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:58:02 -0700, Bob Casanova  wrote:   
      
   >his insistence that *all* those on his list are your nyms is a   
   >thin mask   
      
       LOL!!! They are all "different" people Goo has dishonestly pretended to be   
   over the years. You're right to think it's lowlife and contemptible because it   
   is, but Goo DID do it because that's what he is. If you're not Goo and you deny   
   to yourself what he did then it's because you don't want to accept what a   
   contemptible person the Goober is, but he still IS that way even if you fool   
   yourself into thinking he's not. LOL...HE fooled you into thinking he's not,   
   but   
   you let yourself be fooled also. If you're not Goo you are both at fault and   
   Goo   
   has successfully tricked you so he's one up on you big time. And all I'm doing   
   is pointing out what Goo did to you...LOL....IF you're not Goo....   
      
   >created to foster the belief in others that no one   
   >but you disagrees with him.   
      
       I didn't make Goo pretend to be the dozens of "different" people I've got   
   on   
   the list, or the probably 4+ times MORE he has also dishonestly pretended to be   
   that I'm not aware of and don't have on the list. There are also quite a few I   
   know of that I don't have on the list, like he has dishonestly posted as me,   
   and   
   as Ron Hamilton, and countless other people who do exist and he dishonestly   
   pretended to be in addition to all the others.   
      
       All eliminationists agree with Goo that the lives of livestock should not   
   be   
   given as much or more consideration than their deaths, but all people who have   
   come through the forum who honestly favor decent AW over elimination have   
   naturally agreed with me. Two people who are misnomer opponents have said they   
   don't agree with me but neither could say why or how, and neither seemed to   
   care   
   much if at all about welfare. One other person who I suspect of having been a   
   dishonest eliminationist like Goo had some oppositions, but even he admitted   
   that they were eliminationist arguments. All people who had anything to do with   
   raising animals have agreed with me, and THEY are the ones I respect and care   
   about the opinion of, not people who have never had any significant experience   
   around farms or livestock. Like a girl who was an ag student working with   
   fistulated cattle, and a woman who has her own farm and is much involved with   
   an   
   AW organization in her area. And a rice farmer who wrote quite a bit explaining   
   to eliminationists how they contribute to the deaths of wildlife through their   
   purchasing of rice, but he also raises reduced cruelty livestock to sell to   
   that   
   nich of people. Those are the type people who matter to me, not eliminationists   
   who want people to accept the elimination of all domestic animals and try to   
   promote it by insisting that nothing has ever benefitted from living, like you   
   and Goo.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)