XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:48:32 -0700, Bob Casanova (Goo?) wrote:   
      
   >On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:09:26 -0500, the following appeared   
   >in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:   
   >   
   >>On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:06:43 -0700, Bob Casanova (Goo?) wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:26:00 -0500, the following appeared   
   >>>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:26:42 -0700, Goo wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:44:39 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:31:45 -0800, Goo wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >>>>I'm adding Bob Casanova to your list Goo.   
   >   
   >>>Sorry, but no. As I said in a previous post, check the   
   >>>headers.   
   >>   
   >>    For what? Do you think Goo isn't capable of using more than one computer?   
   >   
   >Anyone is. But there's no reason to think *he* is   
      
       LOL!!! I have dozens of reasons and shared them with you, so if you still   
   want to pretend Goo wasn't horribly dishonest dozens of times then you're   
   persuading yourself to believe a lie which is exactly what the Goober wants you   
   to do. Goo wins AGAINST you, IF you're not Goo. If you are Goo you're just   
   lying   
   again in a way you've lied dozens of times in the past that I'm aware of.   
      
   >, other   
   >than your paranoia. And that's no reason at all.   
   >   
   >>>> You've been caught yet AGAIN   
   >>>>dishonestly pretending to be "another" person, Goober. No one else would   
   just   
   >>>>dive in and start trying to help you insist life is not a benefit without   
   being   
   >>>>able to say what he thinks is preventing it from being one, JUST LIKE YOU.   
   >   
   >>>Again, no.   
   >   
   >>    Then say what you think is preventing it from being one   
   >   
   >I've done so. Several times. Your inability to understand   
      
       Quote what you want people to think you're trying to refer to. Go:   
      
   >the reasons is your problem, not mine.   
   >   
   >>>Anyone capable of rational thought and logic   
   >>>would be tempted to do the same, since your assertion is not   
   >>>only wrong, but ridiculously so. Life is not a "benefit".   
   >>>It's a prerequisite for either benefits or the opposite, but   
   >>>it's neither in itself.   
   >   
   >>    Now you need to try explaining what you want people to think prevents any   
   >>prerequisite from being a benefit.   
   >   
   >I've done so. Several times. Your inability to understand   
      
       Quote what you want people to think you're trying to refer to. Go:   
      
   >the reasons is your problem, not mine.   
   >   
   >>>"Everyone's out of step but me!" doesn't play here any more   
   >>>than it does on the parade field. You're wrong, and your   
   >>>boring and repetitive insistence that you're right without   
   >>>being able to show any evidence to support your claim means   
   >>>that you're also an idiot.   
   >   
   >>    Your boring and repetitive insistence that you're right without   
   >>being able to show any evidence to support your claim   
   >   
   >I have no claim; you do. My disagreement with your claim   
   >isn't a claim   
      
       That's a blatant lie. You claim life is not the benefit it clearly appears   
   to be but can't even pretend to try explaining what you want people to think   
   prevents it from being one, JUST LIKE GOO.   
      
   >which requires evidence, only logic. Which I   
   >suppose explains why you can't understand it.   
   >   
   >>>>Here's   
   >>>>the upgraded list Goo, pretty much in order of appearance though I've no   
   doubt   
   >>>>there are more "other people" you've dishonestly pretended to be than I   
   have on   
   >>>>the list:   
   >   
   >Jonathan Ball   
   >Citizen   
   >Benfez   
   >Wilson Woods   
   >Radical Moderate   
   >Bingo   
   >Edward   
   >George   
   >Bill   
   >Fred   
   >Mystery Poster   
   >Merlin the dog   
   >Bob the dog   
   >silvia@onairos.com   
   >elvira   
   >Dieter   
   >"Dieter d.Schmidt@deutsche_telekom.de"   
   >   
   >Abner Hale   
   >Roger Whitaker   
   >Fucktard   
   >Apoo   
   >Ted Bell   
   >notgenx32@yahoo.com   
   >Jay Santos   
   >mortons.steakhouse@chicago.not   
   >Rudy Canoza   
   >Trappist   
   >sb292sb@yahoo.com   
   >Leif Erikson   
   >S. Maizlich   
   >SlipperySlope   
   >Eden   
   >Sylvia Stevens   
   >chico chupacabra   
   >S. Maizlich   
   >T. Howard Pines, Jr.   
   >George Plimpton   
   >Chrissy Degeer   
   >Mauricio Rodriguez, Nihada Tutic and Tim Goss   
   >Pete Crayne, Dare Adelekan, Cathy Demkiw, and about 16 others   
   >Räy Fîscher   
   >Barack Obama   
   >Delma T. Ivey   
   >Bob Casanova   
   >   
   >>>>Bob Casanova   
   >   
   >>>And based on your demonstrated lack of comprehension they're   
   >>>almost certainly nearly all as incorrect as the last one.   
   >   
   >>    No. They're all different people that Goo has dishonestly pretended to be   
   >   
   >Sorry, but I won't take your word for that.   
      
       If you can't acknowledge the truth about Goo you're either someone other   
   than Goo who is impressively stupid, or you're really Goo and lying about it   
   again.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)