XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.sport.football.college,   
   rec.food.cooking   
   XPost: alt.gothic   
      
   On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:07:42 -0800, Goo wrote:   
      
   >On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:10:52 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:35:25 -0800, Goo wussed:   
   >>   
   >>>On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:04:29 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:09:30 -0800, Dutch  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>Lord Infomouse wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 12/24/2012 2:30 PM, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>      They do Goob, even though they're not aware of the position   
   >>>>>>> they're in.   
   >>>>>>> LOL...and that particular fact is a very significant part OF their pov   
   >>>>>>> Goo. If   
   >>>>>>> they were aware of their own position it would be a lot different but   
   >>>>>>> they're   
   >>>>>>> not and you couldn't make them aware of it even if you tried, Goober.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> It's just very surprising that he would admit he doesn't care about   
   >>>>>>>>> the animals.   
   >>>>>>>>> I expect him to try lying that he actually does at some point, but   
   >>>>>>>>> then again he   
   >>>>>>>>> might be afraid to say anything more about it at all. No doubt he   
   >>>>>>>>> doesn't want   
   >>>>>>>>> to and that's why you being his brother have taken over for his lame   
   >>>>>>>>> ass. You   
   >>>>>>>>> people are pathetic Goob...amusing, but pathetic.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Part of the problem that I see is that you have made Goober and Rupert   
   >>>>>> both your enemies, where Rupert is clearly much smarter than Goober and   
   >>>>>> more adept at argument.  Goober likes to declare his opinion as fact and   
   >>>>>> a lot of people know that he is wrong.  Rupert is just afraid to commit   
   >>>>>> to any term or phrase that hasn't been laid out well.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Everybody who bothers to figure out what a load of bullshit he's pushing   
   >>>>>is his enemy.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    Rupert is bullshitting by claiming he can't comprehend the distinction   
   >>>>between lives of positive and negative value imo.   
   >>>   
   >>>What Woopert has said, correctly, is that you can't give any coherent   
   >>>meaning to "lives of possitive [sic] value" except to bullshit   
   >>>tautologically.  That is completely true:  all you can offer as   
   >>>explanation is that a life of possitive [sic] value is one that doesn't   
   >>>have too much negative value in it.   
   >>   
   >>    Negative value caused by what, Goo?   
   >   
   >The cruel treatment you advocate and personally inflict, *Goo*.   
   >   
   >Your bullshit about "decent lives of possitive [sic] value" is   
   >tautological bullshit, *Goo*.  You can't give it any real meaning.  It's   
   >incoherent cracker bullshit.   
      
       If you're too stupid to comprehend "the distinction between "lives of   
   positive value" and "lives of negative value"" then that's why it seems   
   incoherent to you Goo. You brother Rupert claims to be too stupid to comprehend   
   it, and now you do too. In the past you've pretended you could comprehend and   
   so   
   has your brother Goob, but now you both want people to believe you're too   
   stupid. LOL...you people are amusing.... So Goober, since you both want to   
   pretend you're too stupid to comprehend, what do you think you gain from that?   
   LOL...what do you think you gain by acting that clueless and stupid, Goo???   
   Your   
   pet food animals idea and your claim that life isn't a benefit both peg you as   
   extremely stupid Goob. What do you think you gain by acting even MORE stupid,   
   Goo?   
      
   >>>>If not then he's mentally   
   >>>>restricted in ways that no one in my sixth grade class was, since we all   
   could   
   >>>>do it in sixth grade. Since he's an eliminationist we know he like   
   yourself is a   
   >>>>maniacal extremist. He takes the extreme of wanting to see all domestic   
   animals   
   >>>>eliminated, yet can't comprehend a distinction between lives of positive   
   and   
   >>>>negative value so he claims. That means he can't appreciate any distinction   
   >>>>between the value of life for livestock, humans, pets, or wildlife. IF   
   that's   
   >>>>really the case then since he wants to see domestic animals eliminated and   
   can't   
   >>>>appreciate any distinction between the value of life for them and wildlife   
   it   
   >>>>seems he should also want the elimination of wildlife too. Since he can't   
   >>>>appreciate any distinction between the value of life for livestock and   
   humans he   
   >>>>should also want the elimination of humans. Etc...   
   >>>   
   >>>There's that bullshit about your sixth grade class again;   
   >>   
   >>    It was either fifth or sixth grade Goob and I'm being overly generous by   
   >>saying it was sixth. LOL... I'm thinking how funny it would be if one of the   
   >>kids was as stupid as Rupert... If we studied it in sixth grade and   
   discussed it   
   >>with fifth graders, if one of the fifth graders was so stupid that he "didn't   
   >>believe the distinction between "lives of positive value" and "lives of   
   negative   
   >>value" means anything"", I wonder if word of his handicap and incredible   
   >>stupidity would become common knowledge around the school because he's so   
   >>different like a kid who can't speak English, or who is color blind, or walks   
   >>with a bad limp, etc.... He probably would and would be in special   
   >>ed...LOL...but here you people act like he's not stupid...LOL!!!...   
   >>   
   >>>also bullshit   
   >>>about "mentally restricted."   
   >>   
   >>    Goober Rupert is either HORRIBLY restricted which could explain why he   
   was   
   >>stupid enough to become a misnomer addict in the first place, or he's lying   
   >   
   >No.   
      
       LOL!!! Yes Goob, those are the only two possibilities that there   
   are...LOL...it's amusing to think you might not even be aware of that.   
      
   >There is no "restriction"   
      
       He's either horribly restricted or lying, Goo. Those are the only two   
   alternatives Goob.   
      
   >>about being that stupid and he's really not. If he's lying, then why Goo? If   
   >>he's not lying he's horribly restricted mentally. But Goob, he has shown   
   signs   
   >>that he's not that stupid in the past, meaning it's almost certain that he's   
   >>lying now. So we're left with: Why is he lying Goob? Why is he lying to make   
   >>himself look more horribly stupid than he honestly is, Goo?   
   >>   
   >>>You are the one suffering from a limited intellect.  You are stupid.   
   >>>You are congenitally stupid, and as if that weren't bad enough, you're   
   >>>willfully even more stupid.  You *choose* stupidity.   
   >>   
   >>    You're stupid enough to believe your pet food cow story Goober. If you   
   were   
   >>stupid enough to believe it for years even with people pointing out your   
   >>mistake, and since you WERE then you still ARE now Goo. It's not like you got   
   >>less stupid Goob, even though after years of having it pointed out to you you   
   >>finally learned that there ARE NO pet food cattle much less any that are   
   raised   
   >>for twelve years just for the purpose. MAYBE you finally learned that, but   
   then   
   >>again maybe you still believe in them, Goo....you were stupid enough in the   
   past   
   >>and are still as stupid as you were, so maybe you're stupid enough to STILL   
   >>believe in them.......   
   >   
   >y   
      
       You still DO believe in them afawk Goo.   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)