XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.sport.football.college,   
   rec.food.cooking   
   XPost: alt.gothic   
      
   On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:36:27 -0800, Goo wrote:   
      
   >On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:48:37 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:29:09 -0800, Goo wussed:   
   >>   
   >>>On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:28:25 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:01:16 -0800, Goo wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>dh challenged Goo:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:35:25 -0800, Goo defeated Goo easily again:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:04:29 -0500, dh challenged Goo:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:09:30 -0800, Dutch  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Lord Infomouse wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 12/24/2012 2:30 PM, dh challenged Goo:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>       They do   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Part of the problem that I see is that you have made Goober and   
   Rupert   
   >>>>>>>>>> both your enemies   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Everybody who bothers to figure out what a load of bullshit he's   
   pushing   
   >>>>>>>>> is his enemy.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>     Rupert is bullshitting by   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> What Woopert has said, correctly, is that you can't give any coherent   
   >>>>>>> meaning to "lives of possitive [sic] value" except to bullshit   
   >>>>>>> tautologically.  That is completely true:  all you can offer as   
   >>>>>>> explanation is that a life of possitive [sic] value is one that doesn't   
   >>>>>>> have too much negative value in it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>      Negative value caused by what, Goo?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>The cruel treatment you advocate and personally inflict   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    Explain exactly what cruel treatment you want people to think cause   
   >>>>suffering to livestock animals or it will be known that once again you   
   have no   
   >>>>idea what you think you're trying to talk about, Goo.   
   >>>   
   >>>Entering fighting cocks and fighting dogs into animal combats   
   >>   
   >>    That doesn't happen to any animals raised for food Goober. You've made it   
   >>known that you have no idea what you think you're trying to talk about in   
   >>regards to any animals raised for food Goob.   
   >   
   >You've done it.   
      
       You have no clue about the value of life for any animals raised for food   
   Goo, and much MUCH less in regards to animals who fight for their lives. LOL!   
   It's hilarious thinking about you trying to think about it Goob, not that you   
   could even if you tried of course. That's what's funny about it. You can't even   
   appreciate that there could be significant difference between raising chickens   
   to fight and raising dogs to fight. You brother can't either Goo. He can't even   
   think about it in regards to the few grass raised animals he tried  pretending   
   he could do it for:   
      
   "I accept that some nonhuman animals who are raised for food on farms   
   have lives which are such that it is better that they live that life   
   than that they not live at all" - Rupert   
      
   >>Your brother Rupert doesn't either,   
   >>nor does your boy "Dutch". LOL...you people sure do SUCK AT THIS, Goo.   
   >>   
   >>>, *Goo*.   
   >>>>>, *Goo*.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Your bullshit about "decent lives of possitive [sic] value" is   
   >>>>>tautological bullshit   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    What have I told you it means Goob, are you too incoherent to remember   
   >>>>because you're too incoherent to comprehend?   
   >>>   
   >>>I have told *you*   
   >>   
   >>    You just confirmed my suspicion that you're too incoherent to remember   
   >>because you're too incoherent to comprehend, Goo.   
   >>   
   >>>>    ONLY if a person is too stupid to comprehend, Goo. What did I tell you   
   it   
   >>>>means Goober, don't you even know that?   
   >>>>. . .   
   >>>>>>>> If not then he's mentally   
   >>>>>>>> restricted in ways that no one in my sixth grade class was   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> There's that bullshit about your sixth grade class again; also bullshit   
   >>>>>>> about "mentally restricted."   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You are the one suffering from a limited intellect.  You are stupid.   
   You   
   >>>>>>> are congenitally stupid, and as if that weren't bad enough, you're   
   willfully   
   >>>>>>> even more stupid.  You *choose* stupidity.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>    Goober Rupert is either HORRIBLY restricted which could explain why   
   he was   
   >>>>>>stupid enough to become a misnomer addict in the first place, or he's   
   lying   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>No.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    Those are the only two possibilities in this case, Goo.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>There is no "restriction" - LOL!!!! - at all, *Goo*.  You are not   
   >>>>>looking at "the situation" - LOL!!!! - with any special insight that   
   >>>>>others don't have,   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    I've told you that Goob, when I mentioned that no one in my sixth grade   
   >>>>class had a problem with it. It's not that it's any special insight to   
   >>>>appreciate what I point out Goober, it's that it's a horrible mental   
   restriction   
   >>>>to be unable to comprehend. Even being unable to appreciate it if he or you   
   >>>>COULD comprehend would still be a horrible mental restriction, Goo.   
   >>>>. . .   
   >>>   
   >>>LOL!!!!!   
   >>   
   >>    The fact that you're only capable of hysterics confirms your horrible   
   mental   
   >>restriction Goob. LOL! But then if you tried to oppose the facts I pointed   
   out   
   >>you would then be confirming your same restriction that way...LOL...   
   >>   
   >>>>>your own crippling mental restrictions.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    What do you think you're trying to talk about Goo, don't you have any   
   clue   
   >>>>about that either?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)