XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.sport.football.college,   
   rec.food.cooking   
   XPost: alt.gothic   
      
   On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:23:29 -0800, Goo proved me correct:   
      
   >On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:06:02 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:36:27 -0800, Goo wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:48:37 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:29:09 -0800, Goo wussed:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:28:25 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:01:16 -0800, Goo wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>dh challenged Goo:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:35:25 -0800, Goo defeated Goo easily again:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:04:29 -0500, dh challenged Goo:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:09:30 -0800, Dutch  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Lord Infomouse wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/24/2012 2:30 PM, dh challenged Goo:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>       They do   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Part of the problem that I see is that you have made Goober and   
   Rupert   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> both your enemies   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Everybody who bothers to figure out what a load of bullshit he's   
   pushing   
   >>>>>>>>>>> is his enemy.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>     Rupert is bullshitting by   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> What Woopert has said, correctly, is that you can't give any coherent   
   >>>>>>>>> meaning to "lives of possitive [sic] value" except to bullshit   
   >>>>>>>>> tautologically.  That is completely true:  all you can offer as   
   >>>>>>>>> explanation is that a life of possitive [sic] value is one that   
   doesn't   
   >>>>>>>>> have too much negative value in it.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>      Negative value caused by what, Goo?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>The cruel treatment you advocate and personally inflict   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>    Explain exactly what cruel treatment you want people to think cause   
   >>>>>>suffering to livestock animals or it will be known that once again you   
   have no   
   >>>>>>idea what you think you're trying to talk about, Goo.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Entering fighting cocks and fighting dogs into animal combats   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    That doesn't happen to any animals raised for food Goober. You've made   
   it   
   >>>>known that you have no idea what you think you're trying to talk about in   
   >>>>regards to any animals raised for food Goob.   
   >>>   
   >>>You've done it.   
   >>   
   >>    You have no clue about the value of life for any animals raised for food   
   >>Goo, and much MUCH less in regards to animals who fight for their lives. LOL!   
   >>It's hilarious thinking about you trying to think about it Goob, not that you   
   >>could even if you tried of course. That's what's funny about it.   
   >   
   >The value of life for the animals you have entered into animal combats   
   >is entirely negative.   
      
       LOL!!! You proved me correct, Goo.   
      
   >>You can't even   
   >>appreciate that there could be significant difference between raising   
   chickens   
   >>to fight and raising dogs to fight. You brother can't either Goo. He can't   
   even   
   >>think about it in regards to the few grass raised animals he tried    
   pretending   
   >>he could do it for:   
   >>   
   >>"I accept that some nonhuman animals who are raised for food on farms   
   >>have lives which are such that it is better that they live that life   
   >>than that they not live at all" - Rupert   
   >>   
   >>>>Your brother Rupert doesn't either,   
   >>>>nor does your boy "Dutch". LOL...you people sure do SUCK AT THIS, Goo.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)