XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
      
   On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:47:36 -0800, Goo wrote:   
      
   >On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:30:07 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:15:32 -0800, Goo maundered:   
   >>   
   >>>On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:17:44 -0500, dh@. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:15:18 -0800, Dutch  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>dh@. wrote:   
   >>>>>>      He asked if the lives of wildlife and domestic animals should not   
   be   
   >>>>>> considered as equal Goob. That's what I suggest and what    
   liminationists and   
   >>>>>> ONLY eliminationists have reason to oppose, Goo.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>That's meaningless drivel.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    We've seen that it's the truth. ONLY eliminationists have reason to   
   oppose   
   >>>>it, while no other group of people does.   
   >>>   
   >>>Nothing but meaningless drivel - pure bullshit.   
   >>   
   >>    What group of people other than eliminationists do you want us to think   
   have   
   >>reason to oppose taking the animals' lives into consideration, Goo?   
   >   
   >Everyone knows your "getting to experience life" nonsense is bullshit -   
   >meaningless drivel.  Everyone.   
      
       ONLY eliminationists have reason to feel that way Goob, and NO ONE else.   
   That's why you can't even pretend that anyone else does, Goo.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)