XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism
XPost: sci.skeptic
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:07:21 -0800, Goo wrote:
>On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:38:13 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:47:36 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:30:07 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:15:32 -0800, Goo maundered:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:17:44 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:15:18 -0800, Dutch wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>> He asked if the lives of wildlife and domestic animals should
not be
>>>>>>>> considered as equal Goob. That's what I suggest and what
eliminationists and
>>>>>>>> ONLY eliminationists have reason to oppose, Goo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That's meaningless drivel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We've seen that it's the truth. ONLY eliminationists have reason to
oppose
>>>>>>it, while no other group of people does.
>>>>>
>>>>>Nothing but meaningless drivel - pure bullshit.
>>>>
>>>> What group of people other than eliminationists do you want us to
think have
>>>>reason to oppose taking the animals' lives into consideration, Goo?
>>>
>>>Everyone knows your "getting to experience life" nonsense is bullshit -
>>>meaningless drivel. Everyone.
>>
>> ONLY eliminationists have reason to feel that way Goob, and NO ONE else.
>>That's why you can't even pretend that anyone else does, Goo.
>
>*Every* thinking person feels that way.
I have no reason to avoid considering the lives of the chickens I eat Goo,
or the lives of turkey or cattle or fish or pigs. The pigs and fish probably
don't have very good lives Goob, but from my experience most cattle and poultry
have decent lives of positive value, with the exception of most commercial
layers and of course their brothers. But you can't appreciate any distinctions,
Goo.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
