XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, alt.religion.hindu
XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, can.politics
From: george@si.not
On 3/12/2013 10:48 PM, Dutch wrote:
> George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 3/12/2013 3:09 PM, Dutch wrote:
>>> dh@. wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:53:15 -0800, Dutch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> dh@. wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:45:07 -0800, Dutch wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:07:57 -0800, Dutch wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> no thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More evidence that you don't eat meat at all of course, but
>>>>>>>> how do you want
>>>>>>>> to try to justify such an aversion for someone who actually
>>>>>>>> does...as if you
>>>>>>>> actually do eat meat but have the aversion?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> moron
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL....even MORE evidence that you don't eat meat. You can't
>>>>>> even think
>>>>>> about eating meat, even if it's never been part of a living animal.
>>>>>> LOL...you
>>>>>> sure revealed yourself this time!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I take partial responsibility for the complete idiot you have
>>>>> degenerated into
>>>>
>>>> LOL!!!
>>>>
>>>>> , I have allowed you to get attention from it. Sorry, I
>>>>> was just having a little fun, and I really thought you would
>>>>> eventually
>>>>> wise up.
>>>>
>>>> Are you finally admitting to being the veg*n eliminationist we
>>>> both know you
>>>> were and still are? I've been pointing out to you that I've been aware
>>>> of it the
>>>> entire time. You never did start eating me like you so pisspoorly try
>>>> to pretend
>>>> you did. It's hard to imagine you finally being honest about even that
>>>> one
>>>> thing...LOL...and maybe even harder for you to imagine it than it is
>>>> for me.
>>>> Really though it seems like it should be a relief for you to finally
>>>> tell the
>>>> truth about it unless you get some sort of good feeling about lying,
>>>> which I
>>>> guess you must since you've been doing it for years and years...
>>>
>>> Part of me always hoped that a light bulb would eventually come on in
>>> your brain, but I haven't been holding my breath. All things considered
>>> you have to be the dumbest fuck I have ever come across.
>>
>> He's worse than simply a dumb fuck. He's a lying dumb fuck. There are
>> some things he knows - for example, that existence *cannot* be a benefit
>> - that he lies and pretends not to know, i.e., pretends to be dumb about
>> it. As another example, he knows that it is not "ethically superior" to
>> cause livestock animals to exist rather than wanting them to be
>> eliminated.
>>
>
> I think you might be giving him more credit for self-awareness than I
> would. I think he's a clueless asshole who can't tell the difference
> between the truth and the bullshit he pulls out of his ass.
*Self* awareness, no - he hasn't a shred of it. But he cannot fail to
be aware of immutable truths that have been pounded into his brain by
others. For example, he knows precisely why existence - "getting to
experience life" - is not and *cannot be* a "benefit" to any livestock
animals. That's why he has to phrase his fuckwitted question in such
tortured and obtuse language: "how do you want people to begin to
undertake to try to plan to set out to think..." Fuckwit *knows* that
the logical explanation for why life *cannot be* a benefit is utterly,
100% compelling. So, because his time is worthless and he is addicted
to fucking around here, he just keep asking the already-dismissed questions.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
