XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, alt.religion.hindu   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.animals.rights.promotion,   
   soc.culture.usa   
      
   On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:33:08 -0700, Dutch  wrote:   
      
   >dh@. wrote:   
   >>      Then anyone reading can now accept the fact that you lied when you   
   said you   
   >> began eating meat, and you lied when you claimed to have somehow changed   
   your   
   >> pov about elimination instantly, completely, and for no apparent reason.   
   >   
   >The reasons were very apparent. I changed my attitude about eating meat   
   >after having intense debates with the participants here, including   
   >...[Goo],   
      
       What did Goo say that supposedly had any influence?   
      
   >Rick Etter, John Mercer, and others. I listened to   
   >reason, it changed my life and made me a better person.   
      
       I believe you're still the eliminationist veg*n you were to begin with   
   since   
   ONLY eliminationists have reason to oppose considering the lives of livestock.   
   Goo is lying about it too, and he helped you understand that those of us who   
   really ARE in favor of decent AW over elimination, do not have respect for   
   those   
   of you who favor elimination for several reasons. So you lie to people who   
   honestly do favor AW in the hopes of fooling them into respecting you more than   
   you deserve. We know you've tried doing that with other things, and of course   
   I'm convinced you're trying to do it with this as well.   
      
   >When are you ever going to learn to listen to reason   
      
       In contrast to that I challenge you, the Googoots, your brother Derek and   
   your Uncle Dr. Wuss to try backing up your absurd or/and horribly dishonest   
   seeming claims trying to find out how you could possibly believe them, but you   
   people fail to provide anything worth even taking into consideration. I   
   challenge you to try explaining how you want people to think your   
   anti-consideration is superior to having consideration. You lose. I challenge   
   you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents your life from   
   being a benefit to you. You lose again. Etc...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)