XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
      
   On Fri, 10 May 2013 07:00:18 -0700, Goo cluelessly puled:   
      
   >On 11/14/2012 11:39 AM, dh@. wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:33:09 +0000, Derek  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> He's never been able to coherently explain why his   
   >>> argument for cock fighting doesn't also defend dog fighting.   
   >>   
   >>      For one thing the dogs aren't game by their nature but the game   
   roosters   
   >> are. That alone is more than you can appreciate.   
   >   
   >A distinction without a difference.  By your shitty cracker illogic,   
   >even if   
   >the fowl may once have been bred as game, they aren't now - none of you   
   >cracker fuckstain fighting cock breeders breeds them in order to hunt   
   >them and eat them.   
      
       LOL! That's not the definition of game that their name refers to you stupid   
   clueless Goober. You have proven that what I pointed out is more than you can   
   appreciate, Goo.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)