XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian   
   From: george@si.not   
      
   On 5/13/2013 6:06 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,   
   illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and   
   doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:   
      
   > On 5/10/2013 7:00 AM, George Plimpton wrote:   
   >> On 11/14/2012 11:39 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate   
   cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing but   
   wasting time ever since, lied:   
   >>> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:33:09 +0000, Derek  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> He's never been able to coherently explain why his   
   >>>> argument for cock fighting doesn't also defend dog fighting.   
   >>>   
   >>>      For one thing the dogs aren't game by their nature but the game   
   >>> roosters   
   >>> are. That alone is more than you can appreciate.   
   >>   
   >> A distinction without a difference.  By your shitty cracker illogic,   
   >> both of them "benefit" by "getting to experience life."  Second, even if   
   >> the fowl may once have been bred as game, they aren't now - none of you   
   >> cracker fuckstain fighting cock breeders breeds them in order to hunt   
   >> them and eat them.   
   >>   
   >> No, your stupid cracker illogic dictates that you *absolutely* support   
   >> breeding fighting dogs.  And of course, you do.   
   >   
   >      LOL! That's not the definition of game that   
      
   The fighting cocks you breed for combat are not game.  That's settled,   
   *Goo* - not in dispute.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)