XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, can.politics   
   From: campbell@neotext.ca   
      
   On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 07:13:30 -0700, George Plimpton wrote:   
      
   > On 9/5/2013 3:00 AM, Dhu on Gate wrote:   
   >> On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:59:26 -0700, George Plimpton wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> There is no importance at all to the "getting".  If some livestock   
   >>> animals "get to experience life", that isn't good for them; and if no   
   >>> livestock animals "get to experience life", that isn't bad for any   
   >>> animals.  If livestock animals exist, then experiencing a good life is   
   >>> better for them than experiencing a bad life.  It is not "better" for   
   >>> the animals to experience a good life than never to live at all.   
   >>   
   >> The question is whether it is good for us humans to have domestic animals,   
   and   
   >   
   > No, that isn't the question.   
      
   Still think there's no harm in pullin' wings offa flies, eh?   
   You'd 'a' made a fine sonterkommando.   
      
   Dhu   
      
      
   --   
   Ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)