XPost: alt.fan.jai-maharaj, soc.culture.indian, alt.religion.hindu   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.animals.rights.promotion,   
   soc.culture.usa   
   From: george@si.not   
      
   On 10/2/2013 12:22 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Gloo* - stupid,   
   illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and   
   doing nothing but wasting time ever since, confessed and *lost again*:   
      
   > We could also consider that animals   
   > raised for food aren't simply "killed" as the animals in crop fields are, but   
   > instead they experience whatever life they do, some of them good and some of   
   > them not good, ONLY because humans raise them for food.   
      
   Meaningless.  Their "experiencing" of life is not morally considerable.   
     It has no moral importance at all.   
      
   This is what I meant by you having no case, Fuckwit.  While what you   
   wrote is true, it is trivial.  It has no bearing on the ethical decision   
   of whether or not we *ought* to raise animals for food.  It offers no   
   clarity or ethical guidance at all.  It's a complete waste of time.   
      
   You have no case.  You are not a man.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)