XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.survival, alt.science   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa   
   From: NoOne@private.corp   
      
   On 8/29/2024 10:47 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:   
   > On 8/30/24 12:36 AM, rbowman wrote:   
   >> On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 21:32:14 -0600, John Doe wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> So, it could either be a vast conspiracy, or it could be that a   
   >>> constantly mutating virus is hard to stay ahead of. Gosh, which could it   
   >>> be.   
   >>   
   >> Given the history of the flu vaccines which seldom have greater than 50%   
   >> efficacy and miss completely some years, I'll go with annual cash cow   
   >> that   
   >> may or may not be effective.   
   >   
   >    Hey, 50% is much better than nothing.   
   >   
   >    And the vax is CHEAP too.   
   >   
   >    There are also shades of 'effective' ... vax that   
   >    don't ENTIRELY keep you from getting sick may still   
   >    make the sickness less and shorter.   
   >   
   >    So, shortly, I'll get the new vax.   
   >   
   >    DO like to wait a few weeks just to look for some   
   >    unexpected spate of side-effects ....   
      
   I'm in the same camp. My doctor recommends it, and I trust him more than   
   I trust politicians.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)