XPost: england.genealogy.misc, england.history.misc, soc.genealogy.britain   
   XPost: soc.history, alt.genealogy   
   From: G6JPG@soft255.demon.co.uk   
      
   In message , Steve Hayes   
    writes:   
   >On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 08:04:59 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>In message <0m4m2blnpj3el62hehob679o1danln696u@4ax.com>, Steve Hayes   
   >> writes:   
   >>[]   
   >>>A new genetic map of Britain shows that there has been little movement   
   >>>between areas of Britain which were former tribal kingoms in   
   >>>Anglo-Saxon England   
   []   
   >>It would be interesting to have another study taken without the   
   >>restriction, to see how things _have_ changed since "mass migration".   
   >   
   >I think the restriction would have been necessary to discover what   
   >they had changed *from*.   
   >   
   >If you want to find the DNA of a particular area, it makes little   
   >sense to test the DNA of people who *have* migrated from elsewhere.   
   >Only when yopu've established the base can you work out where the   
   >others may have migrated from.   
   >   
   I agree, and this first study is certainly useful. I was just a little   
   cross with the headline ("there has been little movement"), since it is   
   misleading (though probably pleasing to the target audience).   
   --   
   J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf   
      
   I quite like being cosy and complacent, I'm not doing any harm. I like to   
   watch talented people make cakes. So there. - Alison Graham, RT 19-25 October   
   2013   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)