Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.history    |    Pretty sure discussion of all kinds    |    15,187 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,284 of 15,187    |
|    Ronny Koch to All    |
|    If the tabloids had been around in his d    |
|    20 Jan 16 06:48:11    |
      XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.guns, alabama.general       XPost: memphis.events       From: rkoch@banmlkday.com              Martin Luther King was a hero but he was certainly no saint. If       he'd had to face aggressive tabloids and gossip websites, his       career would have been destroyed – as, of course, would John F       Kennedy's.              Let's begin with the real career-killer: he plagiarised his       doctoral thesis from Boston University. This very useful post on       snopes.com about the Martin Luther King scandals does a good job       of separating myth from reality, and the plagiarism is proven.       The following is from The New York Times in 1991:              A committee of scholars appointed by Boston University concluded       today that the Rev Martin Luther King Jr plagiarized passages in       his dissertation for a doctoral degree at the university 36       years ago.              "There is no question," the committee said in a report to the       university's provost, "but that Dr King plagiarized in the       dissertation by appropriating material from sources not       explicitly credited in notes, or mistakenly credited, or       credited generally and at some distance in the text from a close       paraphrase or verbatim quotation."              Despite its finding, the committee said that "no thought should       be given to the revocation of Dr King's doctoral degree," an       action that the panel said would serve no purpose.              But the committee did recommend that a letter stating its       finding be placed with the official copy of Dr King's       dissertation in the university's library.              You may not be surprised to learn that the story of King's       plagiarism was around for a long time before the American press       deigned to touch it – but when his old university found him       retrospectively guilty the story could hardly be ignored.       Needless to say, BU didn't take away his doctorate, as it would       have in almost any other similar case.              Then there's King's womanising, not quite as pathological as       JFK's but still – even according to some of his friends – pretty       vigorous. Civil rights activist Ralph Abernathy, who was with       him when he was murdered, was explicit on the subject in his       autobiography. As People magazine reported in 1989:              Abernathy's damning charge is that King spent the last night of       his life enjoying two successive extramarital liaisons, followed       by a knockdown motel-room fight with a third woman.              Abernathy caused huge offence with his claim – but he replied by       saying that he was keen to dispel myths about King. Yes, he had       a voracious sexual appetite; but no, he did not have a taste for       white prostitutes, as his enemies alleged. Those enemies       included Jackie Kennedy, as the Daily Mail reported in 2011:              Jackie Kennedy hated Martin Luther King so much she could barely       look at photographs of him.              In interviews taped in 1964 but only just released, she said the       black civil rights leader was a "terrible man" and a "phoney".              She claimed King bragged of being drunk at her husband John F       Kennedy’s funeral and had been caught trying to set up an orgy.              Mrs Kennedy said her view of King was formed after being told       [by Robert Kennedy] of secret FBI wiretaps which showed him       trying to organise a sex party before he attended the March on       Washington in August 1963, at which he delivered his "I Have a       Dream" speech.              As I say, Martin Luther King was a hero. We shouldn't remember       him for cheating on his doctorate and his wife. But it's worth       noting: if he'd been a famous white Republican, his reputation       would have been comprehensively trashed by historians and the       media.              http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100232872/if-       the-tabloids-had-been-around-in-his-day-dr-martin-luther-king-       would-be-in-big-trouble/                      --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca