Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.history    |    Pretty sure discussion of all kinds    |    15,187 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,604 of 15,187    |
|    crom well to All    |
|    Watergate Revisionism 1 (1/2)    |
|    26 Jul 17 23:38:34    |
      From: instruct505@gmail.com              Watergate Revisionism 1.              The Secret Plot to Make Ted Kennedy President, 2008, Penguin Sentinel, by       Geoff Sheppard.              Geoff Sheppard has a long association with Nixon administration. Recipent of       the Richard Nixon Scholarship, awarded by Nixon himself in 1965, Sheppard       graduated from Whittier College and went onto to work at the Treasury       Department until, in September        1970, he joined the Domestic Council Staff under the infamous John Ehrichman.              During the Watergate Scandal, Sheppard functioned as Principled Deputy to J.       Fred Buzhard and was therefore a key player in Nixon’s Watergate Defence       Counsel (1). Sheppard is therefore well equipped at putting square pegs in       round holes – producing        a defense for President Nixon.              Sheppard claims to have written a book on the “real Watergate Conspiracy”,       which he situates under various guises. His chapter headings give a taste of       things to come. Chapter 6, 18, 19 and 20 refer to what he calls “The       Camelot Conspiracy" and        scattered throughout the text (2) along with “Kennedy clan democrats”(3)       Get Nixon squad” (4) “Camelot restoration” (5). You get the idea.               The other conspiracy we are all familiar with, the one led by Richard Nixon       and featuring Haldeman, Erlichnman, Dean, Colson, Magruder et al, is a mere       side show here.              Sheppard sets out his stall, by alleging that many of the individuals –       political functionaries and lawyers – associated with the investigation of       Watergate, were brought to political life, or began their careers, or were       loyal to, the Kennedy        family, and pursuit a common goal, in getting rid of Nixon and putting Teddy       Kennedy on the vacant throne.              It would have probably helped, if someone at Sheppard’s publishers at       Penguin, or amongst his circle, had reminded him that Teddy Kennedy was a       member of the US Senate, and that the desire for high office, far from forming       a dark conspiracy goal, is        actually quite normal! Once we realize , that at the time, the speculation       that Teddy might become the 38th President, was no secret, the foundations of       Sheppard’s conspiracy already begins to look a little shaky.              As for the alleged predominance of personnel either loyal or associated with       the Kennedy era, we should hardly be surprised, that such names pop up in this       history. JFK was President from January 1960 to November 1963, while his       brother Bobby held the        Attorney Generals role between 61 and 64, when many of these individuals were       cutting their political and legal teeth. What Sheppard doesn’t do is       compare this with other individuals associated for example with the Johnson       era. Considering that this        appears to be Sheppard’s most powerful card, it is surprising that he does       little to address the possible confirmation bias that may be the most probably       explanation.              The Kennedy Family under the tutelage of Joseph P Kennedy, numbered themselves       as part of the US elite. The elder Kennedy used his wealth, to win political       power for his sons. However, this project was already in decline by the time        Teddy Kennedy        found himself next in line.               On July 18th, 1969, Senator Ted Kennedy hosted a party on Chappaquiddick       Island. During the evening, Kennedy left and for reasons that remain       unclear, drove his vehicle off the Chappaquiddick bridge. While Kennedy       escaped, his passenger 28 year old        campaign worker Mary Jo Kopechne, drowned in the vehicle.               Kennedy subsequently pleaded guilty, to leaving the scene of a crash causing       personal injury and received a suspended two year prison sentence. The       scandal dogged him for the rest of his life, and probably ended any       aspirations he had to become        President. It is important that the reader not lose site of this fact. If       Sheppard is right, then the plot of which he writes, failed miserably.              When it comes to influence in the House and Senate, we are dealing with a       simple numbers game. In 1972, the Democrats were the party of the majority in       both institutions. Of the 100 seats in the Senate, the Democrats held 55 of       them while the        Republicans had 44. There is no great revelation in observing that the latter       grouping formed the core support for Richard Nixon. What is not as well known       was that Nixon also obtained support from the so-called Southern Democrats or       Dixecrats, who        made up roughly 18 Senatorial seats.              Barry Sussman is quite helpful on this. He analysises Nixon’s infamous       “Enemies List” for who was not on it, rather than who was. He draws the       interesting conclusion that, Nixon was “lending encouragement or support of       one kind or another to 42.       5 of the opposition’s party’s incumbent candidates.” (6). Nixon’s       broad support is clear, but what about Teddy Kennedy?       An important historical episode, which occurred just before the famous arrests       on the 17th June, 1972, provides an answer to this.              One of the important roles of the Senate Judicial Committee, was the       confirmation of Presidential nominations. Teddy Kennedy sat on this       committee. Richard Kleindienst, who had served as the Deputy Attorney       General, now sought promotion when John        Mitchell the then Attorney General moved to the Committee to Re-elect the       President [CREEP}.                Everything went smoothly, until February 25th 1972, when newspaper columnist       Jack Anderson, printed allegations that the corporation ITT had paid monies to       underwrite the Republican convention, in return for the dropping of an       anti-trust lawsuit by        the Justice Department, in which Kleindienst was implicated.        Furious Kleidienst demanded that his confirmations be re-opened in order to       clear his name. So began the longest confirmation hearings in history –       from 5 March to 27 April 1972. Now the Kennedy democrats – lest the concept       have meaning –        raised their heads.              When the judiciary committee had deliberated at length and had still not       developed the evidence to create a consensus to reject the nomination, the       committee voted 16 – 4 to send it back to the full Senate. Kennedy having       lost in the committee, now        attempted to get support of the full Senate to send the nomination back.        Again he lost 63-20. The New York Times noted that the refusal to accept       Kleidienst nomination came “almost exclusively from the liberal democract       ranks of the Senate”(7).        Here was the Kennedy faction in action, with less than half the support of the       Democratic party and a 1/5 of the Senate as a whole. On the question of       Kennedy influence, the numbers speak for themselves.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca