Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.history    |    Pretty sure discussion of all kinds    |    15,187 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,608 of 15,187    |
|    Dr. Jai Maharaj to All    |
|    Re: 'Dunkirk' Sparks Debate in Bharat Ov    |
|    02 Aug 17 19:21:05    |
      XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, rec.arts.movies.current-films       XPost: soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.british, uk.politics.misc       XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.india       From: alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com              Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:       >       > 'Dunkirk' Sparks Debate in India Over Failure to Show       > Soldiers From the Country       >       > By Nyay Bhushan       > Hollywood Reporter, hollywoodreporter.com       > July 28, 2017       >       > While Christopher Nolan's film has received critical       > acclaim in India, some media reports have questioned why       > the film has ignored the "significant contribution" of       > Indian soldiers in Dunkirk.       >       > Dunkirk opened in India last Friday to stellar reviews       > and what is considered a strong box-office opening for a       > Hollywood film, bringing in an estimated $2.4 million.       > But not everyone in the country is impressed.       >       > Various reports in leading media outlets have questioned       > why Christopher Nolan's movie ignored what the Times of       > India newspaper calls the "significant contribution" of       > Indian soldiers at Dunkirk. The article, titled "How       > Nolan forgot the desis (Indians) at Dunkirk," notes that       > the omission should be seen in light of the fact that the       > "British public is more well-informed today about the       > Indian role in the World Wars."       >       > It also refers to Oxford historian Yasmin Khan's book The       > Raj at War, in which the author writes, "Britain did not       > fight the Second World War, the British Empire did."       >       > International observers are also echoing a similar       > sentiment. In a column for Slate, John Broich, an       > associate professor of history at Case Western Reserve       > University, wrote that the appearance of Indian soldiers       > in the film "would have provided a good reminder of how       > utterly central the role of the Indian Army was in the       > war. Their service meant the difference between victory       > and defeat."       >       > Broich, whose views have also been quoted by the       > Hindustan Times newspaper, points out that there were       > four companies of the Royal Indian Army Service Corps at       > Dunkirk adding that "observers said they were       > particularly cool under fire and well-organized during       > the retreat."       >       > According to historical data, some 2.5 million soldiers       > from the Indian sub-continent served with the British       > army during World War II. But the depiction of Indian       > soldiers in Hollywood films revolving around the war have       > been few and far between. One of the most notable       > onscreen appearances was last seen in 1996's The English       > Patient, which featured British Indian actor Naveen       > Andrews (Sense8, Lost) in a supporting role as an Indian       > Sikh soldier, Kip Singh, serving in the Italian campaign       > of the war in the Oscar-winning film, which starred Ralph       > Fiennes and Juliette Binoche.       >       > Referring to historical accounts of the war, in an       > article headlined "Miracle at Dunkirk: Indians too were       > trapped with Allied forces," India Today pointed out that       > 1,800 Indian soldiers were tasked with transporting 2,000       > mules carrying arms and ammunition to the war zone in       > France. Since the British army had disbanded its animal       > transport companies after World War I, Indian companies       > were brought in to transport supplies over terrain in       > France that wasn't accessible for cars.       >       > Continues at:       >       > http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/dunkirk-sparks-debate-in       ia-failure-show-soldiers-country-1024935              Does Christopher Nolan's Dunkirk ignore the role of the       Indian army?              BBC News       July 27, 2017              http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-40724861              Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi       Om Shanti              http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca