Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.history    |    Pretty sure discussion of all kinds    |    15,187 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 14,424 of 15,187    |
|    edell@post.com to All    |
|    Here they are: Hillary's 23 biggest scan    |
|    02 Jun 19 07:51:51    |
      XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.politics.trump, alt.rush-limbaugh       XPost: talk.politics.misc              Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal              The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir       V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an       era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the       Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”              The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic       energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with       uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the       American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest       uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of       controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.              But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not       just the Russian president, but also a former American president       and a woman who would like to be the next one.              At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the       Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the       charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his       family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually       sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as       Uranium One.              Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in       the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of       all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since       uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for       national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee       composed of representatives from a number of United States       government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed       off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife,       Hillary Rodham Clinton.              As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in       three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records       show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.       Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four       donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not       publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs.       Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly       identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made       donations as well.              And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to       acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received       $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with       links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.              At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made       promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the       company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been       repeatedly broken, records show.              The New York Times’s examination of the Uranium One deal is       based on dozens of interviews, as well as a review of public       records and securities filings in Canada, Russia and the United       States. Some of the connections between Uranium One and the       Clinton Foundation were unearthed by Peter Schweizer, a former       fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the       forthcoming book “Clinton Cash.” Mr. Schweizer provided a       preview of material in the book to The Times, which scrutinized       his information and built upon it with its own reporting.              Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the       uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special       ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed       by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to       accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer       American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over       decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.              In a statement, Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton’s       presidential campaign, said no one “has ever produced a shred of       evidence supporting the theory that Hillary Clinton ever took       action as secretary of state to support the interests of donors       to the Clinton Foundation.” He emphasized that multiple United       States agencies, as well as the Canadian government, had signed       off on the deal and that, in general, such matters were handled       at a level below the secretary. “To suggest the State       Department, under then-Secretary Clinton, exerted undue       influence in the U.S. government’s review of the sale of Uranium       One is utterly baseless,” he added.              American political campaigns are barred from accepting foreign       donations. But foreigners may give to foundations in the United              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca