home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.history      Pretty sure discussion of all kinds      15,187 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 14,898 of 15,187   
   Steve Hayes to All   
   Re: How The Parthenon Marbles Ended Up I   
   11 Feb 23 08:58:10   
   
   XPost: alt.culture, soc.history   
   From: hayesstw@telkomsa.net   
      
   On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 10:49:34 +0000, "Open Culture"   
    wrote:   
      
   Last month, we delved into a proposal to use digital technology to   
   clone the 2,500-year-old Parthenon Marbles currently housed in the   
   British Museum.   
      
   The hope is that such uncanny facsimiles might finally convince museum   
   Trustees and the British government to return the originals to Athens.   
      
   Today, we';ll take a closer look at just how these treasures of   
   antiquity, known to many as the Elgin marbles, wound up so far afield.   
      
   The most obvious culprit is Thomas Bruce, the 7th Earl of Elgin, who   
   initiated the takeover while serving as Britain's ambassador to the   
   Ottoman Empire from 1798-1803.   
      
   Prior to setting sail for this posting, he hatched a plan to assemble   
   a documentary team who would sketch and create plaster molds of the   
   Parthenon marbles for the eventual edification of artists and   
   architects back home. Better yet, he';d get the British government to   
   pay for it.   
      
   The British government, eying the massive price tag of such a   
   proposal, passed.   
      
   So Elgin used some of his heiress wife's fortune to finance the   
   project himself, hiring landscape painter Giovanni Battista Lusieri -   
   described by Lord Byron as "an Italian painter of the first eminence"   
   -  to oversee a team of draftsmen, sculptors, and architects.   
      
   As The Nerdwriter's Evan Puschak notes above, political alliances and   
   expansionist ambition greased Lord Elgin';s wheels, as the Ottoman   
   Empire and Great Britain found common cause in their hatred of   
   Napoleon.   
      
   British efforts to expel occupying French forces from Egypt generated   
   good will sufficient to secure the requisite firman, a legal document   
   without which Lusieri and the team would not have been given access to   
   the Acropolis.   
      
   The original firman has never surfaced, and the accuracy of what   
   survives - an English translation of an Italian translation - casts   
   Elgin';s acquisition of the marbles in a very dubious light.   
      
   Some scholars and legal experts have asserted that the document in   
   question is a mere administrative letter, since it apparently lacked   
   the signature of Sultan Selim III, which would have given it the   
   contractual heft of a firman.   
      
   In addition to giving the team entry to Acropolis grounds to sketch   
   and make plaster casts, erect scaffolding and expose foundations by   
   digging, the letter allowed for the removal of such sculptures or   
   inscriptions as would not interfere with the work or walls of the   
   Acropolis.   
      
   This implies that the team was to limit itself to windfall apples, the   
   result of the heavy damage the Acropolis sustained during a 1687   
   mortar attack by Venetian forces.   
      
   Some of the dislodged marble had been harvested for building materials   
   or souvenirs, but plenty of goodies remained on the ground for Elgin   
   and company to cart off.   
      
   In an article for Smithsonian Magazine, Hellenist author Bruce Clark   
   details how Elgin's personal assistant, clergyman Philip Hunt,   
   leveraged Britain's support of the Ottoman Empire and anti-France   
   position to blur these boundaries:   
   Seeing how highly the Ottomans valued their alliance with the British,   
   Hunt spotted an opportunity for a further, decisive extension of the   
   Acropolis project. With a nod from the sultan's representative in   
   Athens-who at the time would have been scared to deny a Briton   
   anything-Hunt set about removing the sculptures that still adorned the   
   upper reaches of the Parthenon. This went much further than anyone had   
   imagined possible a few weeks earlier. On July 31, the first of the   
   high-standing sculptures was hauled down, inaugurating a program of   
   systematic stripping, with scores of locals working under Lusieri's   
   enthusiastic supervision.   
      
   Lusieri, whose admirer Lord Byron became a furious critic of Elgin's   
   removal of the Parthenon marbles, ended his days believing that his   
   commitment to Lord Elgin ultimately cost him an illustrious career as   
   a watercolorist.   
      
   He also conceded that the team had been "obliged to be a little   
   barbarous", a gross understatement when one considers their vandalism   
   of the Parthenon during the ten years it took them to make off with   
   half of its surviving treasures - 21 figures from East and West   
   pediments, 15 metope panels, and 246 feet of what had been a   
   continuous narrative frieze.   
      
   Clark notes that although Elgin succeeded in relocating them to   
   British soil, he "derived little personal happiness from his   
   antiquarian acquisitions."   
      
   After numerous logistical headaches involved in their transport, he   
   found himself begging the British government to take them off his   
   hands when an acrimonious divorce landed him in financial straits.   
      
   This time the British government agreed, acquiring the lot for £35,000   
   - less than half of what Lord Elgin claimed to have shelled out for   
   the operation.   
      
   The so-called Elgin Marbles became part of the British Museum's   
   collection in 1816, five years before the Greek War of Independence's   
   start.   
      
   They have been on continual display ever since.   
      
   The 21st-century has witnessed a number of world class museums   
   rethinking the provenance of their most storied artifacts. In many   
   cases, they have elected to return them to their land of origin.   
      
   Greece has long called for the Parthenon marbles in the British Museum   
   to be permanently repatriated to Athens, but thusfar museum Trustees   
   have refused.   
      
   In their opinion, it';s complicated.   
      
   Is it though? Lord Elgin';s ultimate motivations might have been, and   
   Bruce Clark, in a brilliant ninja move, suggests that the return could   
   be viewed as a positive stripping away, atonement by way of getting   
   back to basics:   
   Suppose that among his mixture of motives-personal aggrandizement,   
   rivalry with the French and so on-the welfare of the sculptures   
   actually had been Elgin's primary concern. How could that purpose best   
   be served today? Perhaps by placing the Acropolis sculptures in a   
   place where they would be extremely safe, extremely well conserved and   
   superbly displayed for the enjoyment of all? The Acropolis Museum,   
   which opened in 2009 at the foot of the Parthenon, is an ideal   
   candidate; it was built with the goal of eventually housing all of the   
   surviving elements of the Parthenon frieze…. If the earl really cared   
   about the marbles, and if he were with us today, he would want to see   
   them in Athens now.   
      
   Related Content    
      
   The Metropolitan Museum of Art Restores the Original Colors to Ancient   
   Statues   
      
   Robots Are Carving Replicas of the Parthenon Marbles: Could They Help   
   the Real Ancient Sculptures Return to Greece?   
      
   John Oliver's Show on World-Class Art Museums & Their Looted Art:   
   Watch It Free Online   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca