Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.history    |    Pretty sure discussion of all kinds    |    15,187 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 14,915 of 15,187    |
|    Steve Hayes to All    |
|    Vatican rejects "Doctrine of Discovery"     |
|    02 Apr 23 19:11:24    |
      XPost: alt.religion.christian.catholic, soc.history, alt.religion.christianity       XPost: alt.politics.religion, alt.christnet.religion       From: hayesstw@telkomsa.net              Vatican rejects ‘Doctrine of Discovery’ justifying colonialism              After decades of demands by Indigenous people, Vatican ‘repudiates’       theories that backed colonial-era seizure of lands.              Calls to rescind the Doctrine of Discovery grew louder last year when       Pope Francis made a trip to Canada to apologise for the Catholic       Church's role in abuses at so-called residential schools [File:       Guglielmo Mangiapane/Reuters]              Published On 30 Mar 2023              The Vatican has rejected the “Doctrine of Discovery”, a 15th-century       concept laid out in so-called “papal bulls” that were used to justify       European Christian colonialists’ seizure of Indigenous lands in Africa       and the Americas.              In a statement on Thursday, the Vatican’s development and education       office said the theory (PDF) – which still informs government policies       and laws today – was not part of the Catholic Church’s teachings.              It said the papal bulls were “manipulated for political purposes by       competing colonial powers in order to justify immoral acts against       Indigenous peoples that were carried out, at times, without opposition       from ecclesiastical authorities”.              “In no uncertain terms, the Church’s magisterium upholds the respect       due to every human being,” the statement reads. “The Catholic Church       therefore repudiates those concepts that fail to recognize the       inherent human rights of Indigenous peoples, including what has become       known as the legal and political ‘doctrine of discovery’.”              For decades, Indigenous leaders and community advocates had urged the       Catholic Church to rescind the Doctrine of Discovery, which stated       that European colonialists could claim any territory not yet       “discovered” by Christians.              The papal bulls played a key role in the European conquest of Africa       and the Americas, and their effects are still felt by Indigenous       people.                     Calls to rescind the Doctrine of Discovery grew louder last year when       Pope Francis made a trip to Canada during which he apologised for the       Catholic Church’s role in widespread abuses that took place at       so-called residential schools.              Between the late 1800s and 1990s, more than 150,000 Inuit, First       Nation and Metis children across Canada were taken from their families       and communities and obligated to attend the forced-assimilation       institutions, which were rife with physical, psychological and sexual       violence.              The Haudenosaunee External Relations Committee said at the time of the       pope’s residential school apology that more action was needed from the       church – notably, the revocation of the papal bulls.              “An apology to Indigenous Peoples without action are just empty words.       The Vatican must revoke these Papal Bulls and stand up for Indigenous       Peoples’ rights to their lands in courts, legislatures and elsewhere       in the world,” the committee said in a July 2022 statement.              Indigenous leaders welcomed Thursday’s Vatican statement, even though       it continued to take some distance from acknowledging actual       culpability.              Phil Fontaine, a former national chief of the Assembly of First       Nations in Canada who was part of the delegation that met with Pope       Francis at the Vatican before last year’s trip and then accompanied       him throughout, said the statement was “wonderful”.              He said it resolved an outstanding issue and now put the matter to       civil authorities to revise property laws that cite the doctrine.              “The Holy Father promised that upon his return to Rome, they would       begin work on a statement which was designed to allay the fears and       concerns of many survivors and others concerned about the relationship       between their Catholic Church and our people, and he did as he said he       would do,” Fontaine told The Associated Press news agency.              “Now the ball is in the court of governments, the United States and in       Canada, but particularly in the United States where the doctrine is       embedded in the law,” he said.              “Today’s news on the Vatican’s formal repudiation of the Doctrine of       Discovery is the result of hard work and advocacy on the part of       Indigenous leadership and communities,” Canadian Justice Minister       David Lametti wrote on Twitter. “A doctrine that should have never       existed. This is another step forward.”              The Doctrine of Discovery was cited as recently as a 2005 US Supreme       Court decision involving the Oneida Indian Nation and written by the       late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.              On Thursday, the Vatican offered no evidence that the three papal       bulls (Dum Diversas in 1452, Romanus Pontifex in 1455 and Inter       Caetera in 1493) had themselves been formally abrogated, rescinded or       rejected, as Vatican officials have often said.              But it cited a subsequent papal bull, Sublimis Deus in 1537, that       reaffirmed that Indigenous peoples should not be deprived of their       liberty or the possession of their property, and were not to be       enslaved.              Cardinal Michael Czerny, the Canadian Jesuit whose office co-authored       the statement, stressed that the original papal bulls had long ago       been abrogated and that the use of the term “doctrine” — which in this       case is a legal term, not a religious one — had led to centuries of       confusion about the church’s role.              The original papal bulls, he said, “are being treated as if they were       teaching, magisterial or doctrinal documents, and they are an ad hoc       political move. And I think to solemnly repudiate an ad hoc political       move is to generate more confusion than clarity”.              He stressed that the statement was not just about setting the       historical record straight, but “to discover, identify, analyse and       try to overcome what we can only call the enduring effects of       colonialism today”.              Michele Audette, an Innu senator who was one of the five commissioners       responsible for conducting the National Inquiry into Missing and       Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls in Canada, told the Canadian       Broadcasting Corporation that the announcement left her in disbelief.              “It’s big,” she said in an interview on CBC Daybreak. “That doctrine       made sure we did not exist or were even recognised … It’s one of the       root causes of why the relationship is so broken.”              SOURCE: AL JAZEERA, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS https://t.co/jBJ8hXe69R       --       Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa       Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm       Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com              For information about why crossposting is (usually) good, and multiposting       (nearly always) bad, see:       http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/unice.htm#xpost              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca