Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.history    |    Pretty sure discussion of all kinds    |    15,187 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 14,940 of 15,187    |
|    Jeffrey Rubard to All    |
|    Louis Menand, "The Free World" (2021) (1    |
|    06 Jun 23 18:56:44    |
      From: jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com              PREFACE              This book is about a time when the United States was actively engaged with the       rest of the world. In the twenty years after the end of the Second World War,       the United States invested in the economic recovery of Japan and Western       Europe and extended        loans to other countries around the world. With the United Kingdom, it created       the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund to support global political       stability and international trade. It hosted the new United Nations. Through       its government, its        philanthropic foundations, its universities, and its cultural institutions, it       established exchange programs for writers and scholars, distributed literature       around the globe, and sent art from American collections and music by American       composers and        performers abroad. Its entertainment culture was enjoyed almost everywhere.       And it welcomed and adapted art, ideas, and entertainment from other       countries. Works of literature and philosophy from all over the world were       published in affordable        translations. Foreign movies were imported and distributed across the country.              The number of Americans attending college increased exponentially. Book sales,       record sales, and museum attendance soared. Laws were rewritten to permit       works of art and literature to use virtually any language and to represent       virtually any subject, and        to protect almost any kind of speech. American industry doubled its output.       Consumer choice expanded dramatically. The income and wealth gap between top       earners and the middle class was the smallest in history. The ideological       differences between the two        major political parties were minor, enabling the federal government to invest       in social programs. The legal basis for the social and political equality of       Americans of African ancestry was established and economic opportunities were       opened up for women.        And around the world, colonial empires collapsed, and in their place rose new       independent states.              As conditions changed, so did art and ideas. The expansion of the university,       of book publishing, of the music business, and of the art world, along with       new technologies of reproduction and distribution, speeded up the rate of       innovation. Most striking        was the nature of the audience: people cared. Ideas mattered. Painting       mattered. Movies mattered. Poetry mattered. The way people judged and       interpreted paintings, movies, and poems mattered. People believed in liberty,       and thought it really meant        something. They believed in authenticity, and thought it really meant       something. They believed in democracy and (with some blind spots) in the       common humanity of everyone on the planet. They had lived through a worldwide       depression that lasted almost ten        years and a world war that lasted almost six. They were eager for a fresh       start.              [ Return to the review of “The Free World.” ]              In the same period, American citizens were persecuted and sometimes prosecuted       for their political views. Agencies of the government spied on Americans and       covertly manipulated nongovernmental cultural and political organizations.       Immigration policies        remained highly restrictive. The United States used its financial leverage to       push American goods on foreign markets. It established military bases around       the globe and intervened in the internal political affairs of other states,       rigging elections,        endorsing coups, enabling assassinations, and supporting the extermination of       insurgents. A cold war rhetoric, much of it opportunistic and fear-mongering,       was allowed to permeate public life. And the nation invested in a massive and       expensive military        buildup that was out of all proportion to any threat.              ADVERTISEMENT              Continue reading the main story              A fifth of the population lived in poverty. The enfranchisement of Black       Americans and the opening of economic opportunity to women did little to       lessen the dominance in virtually every sphere of life of white men. A spirit       of American exceptionalism was        widespread, as was a quasi-official belief in something called “the American       way of life,” based on an image of normativity that was (to put it mildly)       not inclusive.              The culture industries, as they expanded, absorbed and commercialized       independent and offbeat culture-makers, and the university, as it expanded,       swallowed up the worlds of creative writing and dissident political opinion.       At the end of this period, the        country plunged into a foreign war of national independence from which it       could not extricate itself for eight years. When it finally did, in the 1970s,       growth leveled off, the economy entered a painful period of adjustment,       ideological differences        sharpened, and the income gap began rapidly increasing. The United States grew       wary of foreign commitments, and other countries grew wary of the United       States.              And yet, something had happened. An enormous change in America’s relations       with the rest of the world had taken place. In 1945, there was widespread       skepticism, even among Americans, about the value and sophistication of       American art and ideas, and        widespread respect for the motives and intentions of the American government.       After 1965, those attitudes were reversed. The United States lost political       credibility, but it had moved from the periphery to the center of an       increasing international        artistic and intellectual life.              [ Return to the review of “The Free World.” ]              Cultures get transformed not deliberately or programmatically but by the       unpredictable effects of social, political, and technological change, and by       random acts of cross-pollination. Ars longa is the ancient proverb, but       actually, art making is short-       term. It is a response to changes in the immediate environment and the       consequence of serendipitous street-level interactions. Between 1945 and 1965,       the rate of serendipity increased, and the environment changed dramatically.       So did art and thought.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca