XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   XPost: alt.locksmithing   
      
   pothead wrote:   
      
   > On 2025-07-28, Nobody  wrote:   
   > > Once again, Usenet user "Snit" appears to be   
   > > attempting to dismiss or deflect attention from a   
   > > legal matter involving an order of protection   
   > > reportedly filed by his former spouse, Ann   
   > > Glasser. He is now claiming that the order of   
   > > protection is invalid on the grounds that such   
   > > orders are not criminal offenses.   
   > >   
   > > However, the documentation, including a screenshot   
   > > of the court involved, indicates that the matter   
   > > was handled by a criminal court. Under Arizona   
   > > law, an order of protection can fall under either   
   > > civil or criminal jurisdiction, depending on the   
   > > circumstances. If an individual violates an   
   > > existing order of protection, it can indeed result   
   > > in criminal charges.  There are also other legal   
   > > scenarios in which such a case would appropriately   
   > > fall under criminal jurisdiction.   
   > >   
   > > Here is the link to the case   
   > > https://imgur.com/QROmBBe   
   >   
   > Snit has many criminal offenses included public   
   > harassment.  And over a dozen traffic violations.   
   > Snit sure is an honest and honorable person like he   
   > reminds us of continually.   
   > ROTFLMAO!   
      
   Is this snit asswipe a real person or some ai bot?   
   I've seen some of his posts in alt.home.repair and   
   always assumed it was a bot because I didn't think   
   anyone could be as stupid as the snit poster. So   
   what's the verdict?   
   LogSplitter   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)