XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.trump.is.a.filthy.lying.insurrectionist.and.rapist.and.shitbag,   
   rec.arts.tv   
   From: Ken@invalid.com   
      
   Byker wrote:   
   > On 8/4/2025 9:33 AM, "Ken," dirty-diaper-wearing shit-encrusted   
   > geriatric lying Nazi fat fuck, lied:   
   >> Byker wrote:   
   >>> On 8/4/2025 8:14 AM, "Ken," dirty-diaper-wearing shit-encrusted   
   >>> geriatric lying Nazi fat fuck, lied:   
   >>>> Hank Griffen wrote:   
   >>>>> WASHINGTON—In what Beltway insiders are calling one of the most   
   >>>>> stunning   
   >>>>> political comebacks in American history, on Sunday Donald J. Trump   
   >>>>> picked   
   >>>>> the disgraced former congressman George Santos to lead the   
   >>>>> Department of   
   >>>>> Labor Statistics.   
   >>>>> "This is such an honor," Santos told reporters. "I really didn't   
   >>>>> think I'd   
   >>>>> get pardoned before Ghislaine."   
   >>>>> The new DLS chief hit the ground running, revising upward the job   
   >>>>> figures   
   >>>>> from every month of Trump’s presidency.   
   >>>>> “The American economy added a million new jobs in May and a billion   
   >>>>> new   
   >>>>> jobs in June,” Santos declared. “President Trump is creating jobs   
   like   
   >>>>> crazy—he even gave me one.”   
   >>>>> The unprecedented surge in job growth has been key to Trump’s sky-high   
   >>>>> approval rating, which Santos said currently stands at 140 percent.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Obviously your post is made in jest.  One thing that is *not* funny   
   >>>> however, is the lack of accuracy in the jobs report for several months.   
   >>>   
   >>> Fuck off, you dirty-diaper-wearing shit-encrusted geriatric   
   >>> Alzheimer's husk. The numbers are accurate. You would never be able   
   >>> to prove otherwise. The only reason you say they are inaccurate is   
   >>> due to your shitty extremist right- wingnut ideology.   
   >>   
   >> If the numbers were accurate, why did they need to revise them??   
   >   
   > You stupid dirty-diaper-wearing shit-encrusted geriatric Alzheimer's   
   > husk: the numbers are *always* revised. You don't have a fucking clue   
   > how the numbers in the BLS Employment Situation reports are collected. I   
   > do. You also don't have a fucking clue what data are used for the   
   > revisions. I do.   
      
   *Excuse me!!*  I did not know you had any talent besides giving blow   
   jobs and using vulgar language on newsgroups.   
   >   
   > All you know is that you rang the bell to summon the orderly to change   
   > your shit-filled diaper 90 minutes ago, and you're still sitting there   
   > stewing your own filth.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)