XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com
On Aug 16, 2025 at 4:37:52 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<107r4og$200dd$1@dont-email.me>:
> On 2025-08-16, Mike Oxbrown wrote:
>> Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 12, 2025 at 6:54:27 PM MST, ""Mike Oxbrown"" wrote
>>> <107gr8j$3l4d9$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>
>>>> So who is he?
>>>> This weirdo is polluting about 20 different groups with off topic
>>>> messages. Am I the only person seeing this? If so, my sincere
>>>> apologies but if not what can we do, if anything to get this
>>>> spammer tossed by his ISP?
>>>> There is strength in numbers. Thank you for your consideration. Now
>>>> back to our regularly scheduledd program.
>>>
>>> Another sock!
>>
>> You sure have quite a collection of socks Mr. Snit.
>> Why is that?
>
> Because snit is a troll.
> Ask him about sigmond, Tmelmosfire and dozens of other nyms and socks he
> has used over the past few decades that he has been trolling.
>
>
>> I also took the time wqhile recovering from minor surgery to check some
>> of your messages and claims you have made. Yes, I am bored to tears. It
>> is very telling Mr. Snit.
>
> Hope you are mending fine.
>
>
>> A. I see no evidence that your claim that diesel has a copy of source
>> code for some bot you evidently wrote. While I am not familiar with the
>> bot I did check the message ID's you post and none of them substantiate
>> that claim. the net of it is just because someone, anyone, claims the
>> coding of any program is poor does not in anyway equate to having
>> source code.
>>
>> Unless you can provide a post where diesel specifically makes that
>> claim, you are 100% off base with your attack. Obviously you do not
>> understand programming, even at a script level. I could provide
>> examples to back up my argument but I doubt you have enough technical
>> ability to understand them.
>
> Snit cannot.
Why would I try to support claims I never made, nor agree with? See: you
trolls can't find significant fault with what I actually say, so you make up
false claims.
> In case you are unaware diesel = Gremlin.
> Same person.
>
> Snit just keeps repeating the same lies hoping they will somehow become
truth.
> He is truly insane.
>
>
>> B. Your accusations that people, pretty much everyone, who disagrees
>> with you is a Steve sock puppet.
>> I see no proof from you regarding that claim. Following your lack of
>> logic that would mean every poster on those websites exposing your
>> trolling is a Steve or someone elses sock. That is ludicrous. It makes
>> no sense.
>
> This is one of snit's go to trolls when he can't defend his points.
> It was worn out 15 years ago and nobody believes anything snit says
> so he is wasting his time.
> Since he is living on the government dole, time is one thing snit has a lot
of.
>
>
>> The real question is why do so many people seem to dislike you?
>> Do you have an answer for that one?
>> And you usual answer of being honest, and replying to trolls and so
>> forth is not acceptable.
>
> The answer is snit is a mentally ill troll who uses USENET as his own
personal
> therapy session.
> For some reason snit enjoys making a fool of himself in public.
> Strange behavior IMHO.
> Very strange.
>
>
>> What have you done over the past 10 years to piss off so many people?
>> Personally I have never encountered on USENET or blogs in general
>> anyone quite like you and why you seem to be the rotten apple in the
>> bunch.
>> It's strange to say the least.
>> You must be one hell of a toxic person to attract so much hate.
>
> Indeed.
> It takes a special kind of toxic to rack up so many different people who
> despise snit.
> And the pattern follows him wherever he goes on USENET.
>
>
>
>> C. Last one for today because this one did take some effort. You claim
>> a poster is a white supremacists which is really a rather bold
>> accusations.
>> You have posted the following message id's many times.
>>
>> <688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>> <683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>> <6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>
>> I've looked at all 3 of them and I see nothing that indicates the
>> poster you are attacking is a white supremacist.
>> Nothing.
>
> I'm that poster.
> You and everyone else snit has attempted to drag into his white supremacy
> world.
> Even his bestie in ACW won't back him on this claim because he knows it is
> 100% false.
>
>> So where are you pulling this accusation from?
> Same place he gets all of his information from, his a$$.
>
>> You may disagree with the poster but nothing you claim matches what
>> that poster has posted. And exactly what does "says things a white
>> supremacist would say" mean?
>
> It doesn't.
> As you have discovered those m-id have nothing to do with snit's claims.
> Others have
> discovered this as well which is why snit is unable to get any traction on
> this even
> from people who disagree, politically, with me.
>
> Snit gets exposed as a lunatic, left wing liar every time.
> And with all the information on the net regarding snit, it doesn't take long.
>
> Bottom line is, snit Michael Glasser of Prescott Arizona is mentally ill.
>
>
>> You are free to explain your pov and how you have arrived at such an
>> incorrect accusation.
>
> He can't.
>
>> You appear to be some kind of compulsive liar snitty.
>
> Actually snit is a pathological liar, not that it matters.
> He is crazy as a bedbug.
A white supremacist attacking me. I am doing something right!
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with
you.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
