XPost: alt.computer.workshop, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: BD@hotmail.co.uk   
      
   On 18/08/2025 21:32, Mike Oxbrown *LIED*   
      
   > Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.   
   >   
   > PROMPT:   
   >   
   > Is snit from Usenet a grifter   
      
   ChatGPT ACTUALLY said:   
      
   *Once again, complete nonsense*.   
      
   Fabricated "quotes" from ChatGPT.   
      
   ChatGPT does not make sweeping personal attacks like this unless fed a   
   leading or malicious prompt. It does not “say” people are grifters,   
   con-artists, or the like. What you have shown here is either   
   cherry-picked, manipulated, or outright invented.   
      
   No evidence whatsoever.   
      
   The post throws around words like “con artist” and “grifter” but offers   
   no actual proof. Usenet accusations are not legal findings. There have   
   never been any court cases or official actions against Michael Glasser   
   (Snit).   
      
   The real picture.   
      
   Michael has been on Usenet for years. He can be argumentative, yes, but   
   so can everyone else here. That doesn’t make him a “grifter”. He is a   
   genuine person with a family, and those of us who know him outside   
   Usenet can confirm he is not what these trolls pretend.   
      
   Projection.   
   The pattern is obvious: people who dislike Snit fabricate and recycle   
   the same accusations endlessly, often under throwaway names. That tells   
   you far more about the accusers than about him.   
      
   So, let’s be clear:   
   Michael Glasser is not a grifter, con-artist, or criminal. The lies   
   posted here are nothing but the usual recycled smears from anonymous trolls.   
      
   --   
   BoaterDave   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)