XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns   
   From: brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com   
      
   On Aug 18, 2025 at 4:43:32 PM MST, "Nobody" wrote   
   <68a3baa4$2$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:   
      
   > "Mike Oxbrown"  wrote in news:10802kh$3bcja   
   > $1@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   >> Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.   
   >>   
   >> PROMPT:   
   >>   
   >> Is snit from Usenet a grifter   
   >>   
   >> ChatGPT said:   
   >>   
   >> You're asking whether "Snit" from Usenet is a grifter. Based on the   
   >> evidence, the answer seems to be yes, or at least he has been widely   
   >> characterized that way.   
   >>   
   >> What's the story behind "Snit"?   
   >>   
   >> Identity: The person known as Snit has been associated with Michael   
   >> Glasser of Prescott, Arizona, also dubbed the "Prescott Computer Guy"   
   >> and labeled a "con artist" and "Usenet lying troll"   
   >> Google Groups   
   >> .   
   >>   
   >> Behavior on Usenet: Multiple users across Usenet newsgroups (like   
   >> comp.os.linux.advocacy) have compiled stories and posts alleging   
   >> deception, trolling, use of sock puppet accounts, and manipulation, all   
   >> contributing to the notion that Snit is not just a prankster—he's a   
   >> serial troll with a history spanning decades   
   >> Rocksolid BBS   
   >> +1   
   >> .   
   >>   
   >> Another snippet goes even further, describing Snit as someone who   
   >> “doesn't handle reality well” and has made others look like saints,   
   >> implying manipulative or deceptive behavior   
   >> Rocksolid BBS   
   >> .   
   >>   
   >> What does that imply?   
   >>   
   >> The repeated use of terms like "con artist", "lying troll", and   
   >> references to a long-standing pattern of deceit suggest that Snit is   
   >> indeed viewed by many as a grifter—someone who deceives or manipulates   
   >> others for personal gain, prestige, or the thrill of it.   
   >>   
   >> If your intent is to find if there are verified legal or formal   
   >> charges, the sources available are anecdotal Usenet discussions and   
   >> personal accusations—not official documentation or legal proceedings.   
   >>   
   >> Summary   
   >>   
   >> Yes, the prevailing view in Usenet communities is that Snit—presumably   
   >> Michael Glasser—acts like a grifter or troll, engaging in deceptive   
   >> practices, misinformation, and manipulative behavior.   
   >>   
   >> If you're looking for more context—like specific posts, evidence, or   
   >> whether this behavior has been proven legally—let me know and I can dig   
   >> deeper!   
   >   
   >   
   > Good poast.   
   > This snit grifter seems to be a professional at extorting the U.S.   
   > Government of monthly undeserved funds.   
   > In case you have not seen the post that someone else posted here is the   
   > link to the entire chatgpt query.   
   > https://chatgpt.com/share/68a3a851-fba8-800a-8349-8e15d3d3b16a   
   > This loser snit seems to be a real pile of dog shit.   
      
      
   https://chatgpt.com/share/68a3c089-2884-8012-8ae3-dbf2403def32   
      
   Hmmmm, but absolutely NO actual evidence against me. Just crying trolls.   
      
   To be fair, it does not find direct lies from Gremlin or Pothead (even though   
   they clearly exist). It does find lies from Carroll:   
      
   https://chatgpt.com/share/68a3c18d-bbec-8012-b7ab-ffcc67717c85   
      
      
   --   
   It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with   
   you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)