XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns   
   From: brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com   
      
   On Aug 18, 2025 at 7:59:56 PM MST, "%" wrote   
   :   
      
   > pothead wrote:   
   >> On 2025-08-18, David B.  wrote:   
   >>> On 18/08/2025 21:32, Mike Oxbrown *LIED*   
   >>>   
   >>>> Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> PROMPT:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Is snit from Usenet a grifter   
   >>>   
   >>> ChatGPT ACTUALLY said:   
   >>>   
   >>> *Once again, complete nonsense*.   
   >>>   
   >>> Fabricated "quotes" from ChatGPT.   
   >>>   
   >>> ChatGPT does not make sweeping personal attacks like this unless fed a   
   >>> leading or malicious prompt. It does not “say” people are grifters,   
   >>> con-artists, or the like. What you have shown here is either   
   >>> cherry-picked, manipulated, or outright invented.   
   >>>   
   >>> No evidence whatsoever.   
   >>>   
   >>> The post throws around words like “con artist” and “grifter” but   
   offers   
   >>> no actual proof. Usenet accusations are not legal findings. There have   
   >>> never been any court cases or official actions against Michael Glasser   
   >>> (Snit).   
   >>>   
   >>> The real picture.   
   >>>   
   >>> Michael has been on Usenet for years. He can be argumentative, yes, but   
   >>> so can everyone else here. That doesn’t make him a “grifter”. He is a   
   >>> genuine person with a family, and those of us who know him outside   
   >>> Usenet can confirm he is not what these trolls pretend.   
   >>>   
   >>> Projection.   
   >>> The pattern is obvious: people who dislike Snit fabricate and recycle   
   >>> the same accusations endlessly, often under throwaway names. That tells   
   >>> you far more about the accusers than about him.   
   >>>   
   >>> So, let’s be clear:   
   >>> Michael Glasser is not a grifter, con-artist, or criminal. The lies   
   >>> posted here are nothing but the usual recycled smears from anonymous   
   trolls.   
   >>>   
   >>> --   
   >>> BoaterDave   
   >>   
   >> You can't defend your useful idiot snit this time David.   
   >> Someone posted the link to the prompt and result. Since you 2   
   >> are addicted to AI you cannot squirm your way out of this one.   
   >> Your boy toy is a con artist, lazy asses grifter and you know it.   
   >> Sorry but the rat is out of the bag.   
   >> You only look ignorant defending snit.   
   >>   
   >>   
   > they can do whatever they like and ,   
   > you will be stuck there watching it happen   
      
   I cannot defend myself against the claim I said... um... what? No quote. But I   
   said it in MID... um... nobody can find it.   
      
   --   
   It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with   
   you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)