Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.home.repair    |    Home repairs and renovations    |    32,593 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 31,483 of 32,593    |
|    All Nines to All    |
|    Shooting Violent Right Wing Extremists I    |
|    28 Sep 25 15:15:35    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.politics.immigration       XPost: alt.politics.trump       From: jimin999999@nine.net              September 14, 2025       Right-Wing Extremists Drive Majority of U.S. Political Violence              Both federal assessments and independent research reveal that the majority       of political violence in the United States is attributed to right-wing       individuals and groups. The Center for Strategic and International Studies       found that right-wing extremists were responsible for approximately 67       percent of extremist-related terrorist plots and attacks between 2015 and       2020. It is important to note that this is not the sole source of data       about U.S. political violence. Measuring Political Violence in the United       States by Ideological Alignment: Right-Wing Actors Dominate Incidents of       Politically Motivated Violence The Landscape of Domestic Political       Violence              Political violence in the U.S. refers to violent acts motivated by       political beliefs, ideologies, or partisan affiliations. These range from       hate crimes and extremist attacks to targeted assassinations and       large-scale terrorism. Data compiled by government agencies and research       institutions show that domestic extremism constitutes an enduring national       security concern.              Note that these acts have historically emerged from multiple ideological       traditions. Left-wing movements produced incidents in the 1960s and 1970s       involving radical groups like the Weather Underground. Right-wing violence       has shown greater persistence. This has been driven by white supremacists,       antigovernment militias, and other extremist factions.              Threat assessments from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department       of Homeland Security highlight that racially-motivated extremists, often       associated with far-right ideologies, remain the most lethal domestic       threat. These agencies also warn that antigovernment extremists continue       to represent a significant and growing source of violence nationwide.              The ideological divide in the U.S. is deeply connected to political       polarization. Research from the Pew Research Center shows that partisan       animosity has reached record levels. Both Republican and Democratic camps       hold unfavorable views of the other. This reinforces ideological identity       and hardens societal divisions across political, cultural, and religious       lines.              Polarization also amplifies the appeal of extremist rhetoric and fosters       settings where individuals are more likely to support or commit violence       against political opponents. Studies note that widespread disinformation,       incendiary political discourse, and the growth of online echo chambers       have further intensified the willingness of individuals to resort to       violence. Statistical Weight of Right-Wing Violence              While left-wing political violence has appeared sporadically in modern       decades, data consistently indicate that right-wing actors are responsible       for the majority of extremist violence. Reports by organizations such as       the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center show that       right-wing extremists dominate organized networks and lethal incidents.              Remember that both the FBI and DHS have identified racially-motivated and       anti-government violent extremism, often rooted in far-right or alt-right       and ultra-conservative ideologies, as the most persistent and lethal       domestic threat. Their joint assessments consistently describe right-wing       extremist activity as posing greater risks compared to left-wing or other       categories.              Moreover, a 2020 congressional report based on filings and testimonies       highlighted that in a dataset of 29 extremist murders in U.S. committed in       2018 and 2019, 26 were attributed to right-wing extremists. This report,       presented during oversight hearings, emphasized the dominance of       right-wing actors and their ideologies in recent years of lethal political       violence.              The Anti-Defamation League reported right-wing extremists, particularly       white supremacists, accounted for 85 percent of extremist-related murders       in the U.S. in 2021. No left-wing extremists were linked to any of the       murders that year. ADL has also reported that 75 percent of political       violence from 2013 to 2020 was committed by right-wing extremists.              Civil society tracking also shows the imbalance. The Southern Poverty Law       Center recorded 1225 hate and antigovernment extremist factions active in       2021. Most of these were classified as part of the radical right movement.       This figure included militias, white nationalist groups, religious       radicals, and sovereign citizen organizations that proliferated       nationwide.              Event-level datasets produced by the Armed Conflict Location and Event       Data Project further confirmed that right-wing groups were responsible for       the largest share of organized violent incidents from 2020 to 2023. ACLED       also explained that many violent events in the United States remain       unattributed or are classified as involving unidentified actors.       Complicating Factors and Other Nuances              However, although right-wing actors dominate the data, analysts note that       incidents of violence associated with left-wing or anarchist groups are       not absent. ACLED and congressional testimonies mention limited events       involving anarchist or radical environmentalist networks, but the totals       remain significantly smaller compared to right-wing extremist activity.              The Government Accountability Office has stressed that methodological       challenges complicate comparisons across datasets. Definitions of       extremism differ. Some incidents are counted as political violence by one       source but excluded by another, and many events remain unattributed during       investigations. Consistent long-term assessments are a continuing       challenge.              Note that the American political spectrum is generally described as a       continuum ranging from left to right. The left is associated with       progressive policies, social justice, and labor activism. The right       emphasizes conservatism, nationalism, and limited government. Radical       extensions of both ends sometimes transform ideological beliefs into       violent extremist action.              It is also worth mentioning that the political center, or the       center-aligned, is typically characterized by moderate stances that blend       policy preferences from both sides. It emphasized pragmatism and       compromises. However, centrists are rarely associated with extremism, as       most cases of politically motivated attacks originate from actors       positioned on ideological extremes.              Political violence in the United States is both a symptom and a further       driver of polarization. It reflects deepening ideological entrenchment,       mistrust across partisan lines, and the influence of extremist       subcultures. This heated, polarized environment muddies national unity and              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca