From: HapilyRetired@fakeaddress.com   
      
   On 11/4/2025 8:23 PM, Ketanji Kornrows wrote:   
   >   
   > A new, peer-reviewed study by researchers in South Korea has found that   
   people who received COVID-19 shots showed significantly higher rates of   
   > developing several cancers—including thyroid, stomach, colon, lung,   
   breast, and prostate—compared to unvaccinated individuals. The research,   
   > published on Sept. 26, 2025 in the journal Biomarker Research, was authored   
   by South Korean medics in orthopedic surgery and critical care and   
   > evaluated data from over eight million adults in the Korean National Health   
   Insurance database to identify a potential link between COVID mRNA   
   > shots and cancer risk within one year after receipt of different types of   
   vaccines.1   
   >   
   > The data indicate that vaccinated individuals had roughly a 35 percent   
   greater increased risk of thyroid cancer and 34 percent greater risk of   
   > gastric cancer, with lung and prostate cancers showing even higher relative   
   risks—53 percent and 68 percent respectively. Breast and colorectal   
   > cancers showed increases of 20 percent and 28 percent. The authors of the   
   study noted that vaccinated men were more likely to develop gastric   
   > and lung cancers, while vaccinated women were more likely to develop thyroid   
   and colorectal cancers.1   
   >   
   > https://thevaccinereaction.org/2025/11/higher-cancer-rates-fou   
   d-after-receipt-of-covid-19-shots/   
   >   
   > The clot-shots don't sound safe and effective to me. Glad I'm an anti-vaxxer.   
      
   I'll provide a different explanation for the apparent finding of   
   increased cancer incidence.  People who are intelligent enough to   
   understand the importance of quality information and advice provided by   
   experts in virology, immunology, infectious diseases etc., are much more   
   likely to get recommended vaccinations and are also more likely to have   
   regular visits with medical personnel.  Those people will experience a   
   much greater incidence of early detection of many diseases, including   
   cancers.  People with no training in any of those fields, and who don't   
   trust things they don't understand and therefore feel suspicious of   
   those things and prefer to believe conspiracy theories are less likely   
   to get recommended vaccinations and less likely to interact regularly   
   with medical professionals. Their cancers remain non-existent and   
   untallied when considering the methodology of the reference cited by the   
   OP.  Faulty study design inevitably leads to faulty data, which leads to   
   faulty conclusions.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)