From: robin_listas@es.invalid   
      
   On 2025-11-06 12:26, Mohran Zamdani wrote:   
   > On 11/5/2025 10:39 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:   
   >> On 11/4/2025 8:23 PM, Ketanji Kornrows wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> A new, peer-reviewed study by researchers in South Korea has found   
   >>> that people who received COVID-19 shots showed significantly higher   
   >>> rates of   
   >>> developing several cancers—including thyroid, stomach, colon, lung,   
   >>> breast, and prostate—compared to unvaccinated individuals. The research,   
   >>> published on Sept. 26, 2025 in the journal Biomarker Research, was   
   >>> authored by South Korean medics in orthopedic surgery and critical   
   >>> care and   
   >>> evaluated data from over eight million adults in the Korean National   
   >>> Health Insurance database to identify a potential link between COVID   
   >>> mRNA   
   >>> shots and cancer risk within one year after receipt of different   
   >>> types of vaccines.1   
   >>>   
   >>> The data indicate that vaccinated individuals had roughly a 35   
   >>> percent greater increased risk of thyroid cancer and 34 percent   
   >>> greater risk of   
   >>> gastric cancer, with lung and prostate cancers showing even higher   
   >>> relative risks—53 percent and 68 percent respectively. Breast and   
   >>> colorectal   
   >>> cancers showed increases of 20 percent and 28 percent. The authors of   
   >>> the study noted that vaccinated men were more likely to develop gastric   
   >>> and lung cancers, while vaccinated women were more likely to develop   
   >>> thyroid and colorectal cancers.1   
   >>>   
   >>> https://thevaccinereaction.org/2025/11/higher-cancer-rates-found-   
   >>> after-receipt-of-covid-19-shots/   
   >>>   
   >>> The clot-shots don't sound safe and effective to me. Glad I'm an   
   >>> anti-vaxxer.   
   >>   
   >> I'll provide a different explanation for the apparent finding of   
   >> increased cancer incidence.  People who are intelligent enough to   
   >> understand the importance of quality information and advice provided by   
   >> experts in virology, immunology, infectious diseases etc., are much more   
   >> likely to get recommended vaccinations and are also more likely to have   
   >> regular visits with medical personnel.  Those people will experience a   
   >> much greater incidence of early detection of many diseases, including   
   >> cancers.  People with no training in any of those fields, and who don't   
   >> trust things they don't understand and therefore feel suspicious of   
   >> those things and prefer to believe conspiracy theories are less likely   
   >> to get recommended vaccinations and less likely to interact regularly   
   >> with medical professionals. Their cancers remain non-existent and   
   >> untallied when considering the methodology of the reference cited by the   
   >> OP.  Faulty study design inevitably leads to faulty data, which leads to   
   >> faulty conclusions.   
   >   
   > If the clot-shots are truly safe and effective, why did the government,   
   > bigPharma, feckless medical doctors and the media censor people who   
   > dared to question their safety?   
      
   Because they are stupid and misguiding.   
      
   >   
   > Democrat's mandate, censor and gaslight the little people. The ignorant   
   > obediently follow along.   
   >   
   >   
      
      
   --   
   Cheers, Carlos.   
   ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)