XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.radio.talk, alt.politics.democrats.d   
   From: mike@nospam.net   
      
   On 15 Feb 2004 15:25:24 GMT, Republican Double Standard   
    wrote:   
      
   >Mike  wrote in   
   >news:c4ru2014a5a1o3v5h2rh5rkjk6hq4ttbtd@4ax.com:   
   >   
   >> On 14 Feb 2004 21:18:54 GMT, Republican Double Standard   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>"Mark T. Evert"  wrote in   
   >>>news:ecwXb.11410$te.3277@fe1.texas.rr.com:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> >   
   >>>>> >> Mike  wrote in   
   >>>>> >>news:o1dn20p9lmgtadd0i5q3b2q990n64195km@   
   >>>>> >> 4ax.com:   
   >>>>> >>   
   >>>>> >>> Nothing HAliburton did comes close to giving China missile   
   >>>>> >>> technology that gave their Nukes the ability to reach the USA.   
   >>>>> >>   
   >>>>> >>You mean like Bush Sr. did during his administration?   
   >>>>> >>   
   >>>>> >>Your right, Bush Sr. is a traitor.   
   >>>>> >>   
   >>>>> >>Clinton allowed the technology transfer, which was started by   
   >>>>> >>Bush Sr., to continue.   
   >>>>> >   
   >>>>> > You never cease to amaze me. Is this your new lie of the day?   
   >>>>> > LOL!   
   >>>>> >   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> In what way is it incorrect?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The missile technology in question was transferred to China   
   >>>> following the investigation of a Chinese rocket failure in 1996.   
   >>>> Loral (whose CEO Bernie Scwartz was the single biggest donor to   
   >>>> Clinton) and Hughes were implicated. Loral was fined $20M in 2002   
   >>>> for the violation for violating sanctions initially put in place in   
   >>>> 1991 by the Bush administration after China was found to be   
   >>>> exporting missile technology to countries like Pakistan and Syria.   
   >>>>   
   >>>And now our good friends in Pakistan are exporting nuclear technology   
   >>>to Iran and North Korea. Nice. You still haven't addressed how the   
   >>>statement that providing missile technology to China started during   
   >>>Poppy's administration is false.   
   >>   
   >> I doubt your assertion, but even if true, 2 wrongs don't make a right.   
   >> Clinton did preside over the transfer and deserves the blame.   
   >>   
   >   
   >So by your logic, Bush "presided" over the 9/11 attack and deserves the   
   >blame.   
      
   The Blame for the Clinton intelligence cuts and Military cuts and weak   
   displays of power? I doubt that providing missile technology to China   
   started during Bush 41's term. Bush would have never let that happen,   
   but we all know what Clinton did.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)