XPost: alt.terrorism.world-trade-center, soc.culture.usa, alt.activism   
   XPost: soc.culture.iraq   
   From: pinkfloppybitsdatstank@hotmail.com   
      
   Republican Double Standard wrote:   
   > "CH"  wrote in   
   > news:VqPXb.25277$1S1.12777@nwrddc01.gnilink.net:   
   >   
   >> Republican Double Standard wrote:   
   >>> "CH"  wrote in   
   >>> news:5wNXb.8093$wD5.5913@nwrddc03.gnilink.net:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Republican Double Standard wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Bush   
   >>>>> can't even prosecute Martha Stewart.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Whatever..............   
   >>>>   
   >>> Outstanding retort. Boy you sure showed me.   
   >>   
   >> The FACT is the Bush admin IS prosecuting MS. That is a fact you do   
   >> know.   
   >>   
   > If they cannot do better than Chris Darden and Marcia Clark with   
   > Martha, how the hell can they expect to nail the real bad guys? You   
   > know - people like Uncle Osama and Kenny-boy.   
      
   In case you are unaware Martha is being prosecuted, your uncle Osama is not   
   being prosecuted by the law he is being hunted down like a dog by GWB's   
   military, Clintoon tried prosecuting because he had the balls to do nothing   
   else and failed costing many American lives.   
      
   >>>>>> What was done after or during   
   >>>>>> his 2 terms (8 years)?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Nothing was done after.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Can't argue the facts?   
   >>>>   
   >>> No you cannot argue the facts. The fact is that Bush did nothing   
   >>> when he came into office. Except re-empower the terrorists.   
   >>   
   >> If Bush had 8 years like Clintoon did, we would not be here today,   
   >> 9-11 would not have happened.   
   >>   
   >   
   > ROTF. That's rich. How long has it been since 9/11? Can you say   
   > "ricin"? Can you say less than 2.5 years and we are being terrorized   
   > yet again?   
      
   The WTC was attacked again!   
      
   > Can you say Clinton bought us 8.5 years between attacks in   
   > the United States? Can you say that Clinton succeeded and Bush failed?   
      
   Yup I can say it........Clinton failed and Bush succeded.   
      
   >>>>> Bush was asleep at the wheel.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Misinformation? Nice jingoism but again devoid of facts.   
   >>>   
   >>> Um, month-long vacation in August? Yeah, devoid of facts. that's you   
   >>> all right.   
   >>   
   >> Still cannot answer the question.......you know the one, the one   
   >> asking you just what Clintoon did to protect us.   
   >>   
   > Answered repeatedly. I cannot help it if you are too stupid to   
   > understand or too partisan to accept it. Here's a partial list - yet   
   > again. Do try and keep up:   
   >   
   > Commissioned Hart-Rudman   
      
   And what did Hart-Rudman do? Nothing.............spent a bunch of money   
   justifying Clintoons inaction.   
      
   > Prosecuted WTC perpetrators   
      
   And left the ringleaders to run free.........so much for the "prosecution".   
      
   > Disarmed Saddam Hussein   
      
   Disarmed Saddam Hussein? Like he made an agreement with N Korea that   
   succeded?   
      
   > Destroyed a confirmed chemical weapons plant in the Sudan   
      
   Don't you mean an asprin factory-----ha-ha-ha-ha   
      
   > Prevented terrorist attacks within US borders for over 8.5 years   
      
   Clintoon didn't prevent anything. He buried his head in the sand while al   
   queda plotted their next attack. History speaks for itself.   
      
   > What has Bush done?   
      
   He has done what Clintoon didn't do. Are you deaf dumb and blind?   
      
   >>>> Bush was not President for the 8 years following WTC 1. If he was   
   >>>> asleep at the wheel it was the State of Texas that was affected,   
   >>>> not the US.   
   >>>>   
   >>> Um, month-long vacation in August? Ignoring Hart-Rudman phase III   
   >>> (which specifically predicted the use of hijacked airplanes as   
   >>> missiles, cited the lax security at Logan and estimated that the   
   >>> attack would occur in late summer?).   
   >>   
   >> Yawn........I heard Bush slept the night before 9-11 also. More   
   >> irrelavent propaganda.   
   >>   
   > You think it's irrelevant that the President's vacations are so   
   > lengthy, numerous and predictable that terrorists know exactly when   
   > they can attack with impunity? That's rich.   
      
   Yes I think it is irrevelant. Grasping for straws are we?   
      
   >>>>>> He lobbed a few cruise missles at a camel stop   
   >>>>>> in the desert and he prosecuted a few lower level members of al   
   >>>>>> queda while letting the leaders plan several more attacks that   
   >>>>>> culminated in the deaths of 4000+ Americans.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> And ironically it is now universally accepted that those "few   
   >>>>> cruise missiles" successfully and completely disarmed Saddam   
   >>>>> Hussein.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> More disinformation?   
   >>>>   
   >>> You seen WMDs in Iraq lately? Didn't think so.   
   >>   
   >> Go back and read the UN resolutions and reports, it's all there. I   
   >> know you seem to have a hard time understanding it but it is in black   
   >> and white. Even a grade schooler can read it and understand.   
   >>   
   > This explains the failure to find WMD in Iraq. They are in the reports   
   > instead. Thanks for clearing that one up.   
      
   Obviously you have not read them, or if you have you do not have the   
   capacity to understand them.   
      
   >> he second attack occurred less than 2 weeks after Bush came   
   >>>>>>> back from a month-long vacation.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> And what did bush do about it? The history book is still being   
   >>>>>> written..........   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> How many of the perpetrators has Bush successfully prosecuted?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ha-ha-ha so the people in Guantanamo Bay are not there? ha-ha-ha   
   >>>> how rich of you............again all's I can do is laugh in your   
   >>>> face!   
   >>>>   
   >>> Locking people up without charging them is not the same as   
   >>> successfully prosecuting them. Why hasn't BushCorp charged the Gitmo   
   >>> detainees? Why don't they prosecute them?   
   >>   
   >> Because thay are safely locked away. They will have their 5 minutes   
   >> of fame, but not based on some liberal interpretation.   
   >>   
   > Locking up people based solely on their race   
      
   Based on their race? So you just have to throw the race card on the table   
   don't ya? Are you black? Or just misinformed?   
      
   > and not being able to   
   > even charge them with crimes. There's the great American judicial   
   > system for you. Uncle Joe must be laughing his head off.   
      
   Ummmm...it is not the American judicial system, they are not Americans. The   
   American judicial system is reserved for citizens not foreigners. A small   
   point obviously lost on you though.   
      
   >> g free? Hardly...have you seen him lately? Seems to me like he   
   >>>> is in hiding. Maybe you know something the rest of the world   
   >>>> doesn't?   
   >>>>   
   >>> "in hiding"? He was "in hiding" in Afghanistan before 9/11 no?   
   >>   
   >> In hiding? No, not hardly, he was openly training al queda and   
   >> taliban, right under Clintoons nose. What did Clintoon do again? I   
   >> haven't heard your response yet.   
   >>   
   >>> Or   
   >>> were you bending your elbow with him at your local pub?   
   >>   
   >> Sorry, I don't hang out at "pubs".   
   >>   
   > Pubs, gay bars, whatever.   
      
   Ahhhhhhhh.....I knew the insults were coming. How typical of a liberal, you   
   cannot argue the facts so you insult the messenger. Too bad.......you just   
   lost.   
      
   >>>>>  is al-Zawahiri. Meanwhile, the Afghan   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)