Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.impeach.bush    |    Debating on impeaching Dubya over 9/11    |    56,304 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 54,465 of 56,304    |
|    .impervious to All    |
|    Re: THE FEAR PRESIDENT    |
|    15 Feb 04 20:34:57    |
      XPost: alt.terrorism.world-trade-center, soc.culture.usa, alt.activism       XPost: soc.culture.iraq       From: thats***disgusting@hotmail.com              In news:VqPXb.25277$1S1.12777@nwrddc01.gnilink.net,       CH attempted to impart some wisdom, instead sputtering:              :: No you cannot argue the facts. The fact is that Bush did nothing when       :: he came into office. Except re-empower the terrorists.       :       : If Bush had 8 years like Clintoon did, we would not be here today,       : 9-11 would not have happened.              here is where your logic is flawed - Clinton *didn't* have 8 years to       stop the attack that happened on his watch... he had thirty-eight days.       Bush had nine months.              :: Yeah - it's lost me on how negotiating with the bad guys is a good       :: thing.       :       : I know it is lost on you, but then again that is not surprising.              the reason it's lost on most liberals is because we remember what       negotiating with the bad guys does... like putting weapons in the hands       of Iraq and Iran, helping to form the Taliban, and installing countless       brutal dictators in countries where we didn't like the democratically       elected leaders.              :: He commissioned Hart-Rudman. That panel specifically predicted the       :: 9/11 attacks.       :       : Bullshit....... more lies. He did nothing but paper over the problem       : leaving it for the next administration. Nobody needed a report to see       : what Clintoon should have seen way before 9-11. He was President you       : know......he was in charge....or he was supposed to be........              here's where your logic fails again... if you feel it's okay to say       what Clinton "should have seen," presumably because it's so glaringly       obvious, then why don't you hold Bush to the same standard? i mean, if       no report was needed to see that 9/11 was going to happen, why wasn't       the guy who was in charge AT THE TIME keeping an eye out? there is just       no way you retards can pin this on Clinton, the way you try to pin       everything on him.              i swear... you people call us the "blame-America-first" crowd... but       while we blame terrorists, you blame Clinton (an American). sheesh.              --       Some of us feel that Mr. Bush will find the real liars about the Iraq       war and about the economy on the same day that O. J. turns up the real       murderers.       -rbbomber              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca