XPost: alt.dear.whitehouse, alt.discuss.politics, alt.politics.bush   
   XPost: alt.politics.clinton, alt.politics.conservative, alt.politics.democrat   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats   
   From: DrummKat54@cox.net   
      
   "The -.-Frog."  wrote in message   
   news:mtuu20d6mm4b9fqvk5r30ne72d2ns6a28p@4ax.com...   
   >   
   > On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 05:20:32 GMT, Roedy Green   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > >On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:32:18 -0800, "Nate"  wrote   
   > >or quoted :   
   > >   
   > >>> 4.Hike up the taxes and take away our hard earned bucks and put the   
   people   
   > >>back   
   > >>> out on the streets!  The Dumbocracks would rather us toil in the   
   fields   
   > >>than   
   > >>> grow rich with one another!   
   > >   
   > >SPENDING is the problem.  If you spend, sooner or later you have to   
   > >pay it off with taxes.  Why not tell Mr. Bush to do something about   
   > >his trillion dollar deficits. How the hell will they be covered if not   
   > >by taxes in some future administration?  Or are you so naive you think   
   > >you don't have to pay back loans or pay interest on them?   
   >   
   > Agreed   
   > And while you are at it, tell us that Kerry has vowed to spend less.   
   > Has he? If not, then what's the point?   
   >   
   > Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time.  - P.J. O'Rourke   
      
      
   Actually, none of the Democrats have said they will raise taxes, only that   
   they will reject the next round of Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.  If your   
   taxes stay the same but you don't get a tax cut, is that a tax increase?   
   Sounds like fuzzy math to me.  And what has Bush said he will do to prevent   
   another 911?  Cheney says another attack is "inevitable".  If security   
   worked, Israel would be the most secure nation in the world.   
      
   I ask you, are we safer today than we were when Bush was elected?  Are   
   terrorist attacks more or less likely?  The sure don't seem to be afraid of   
   little bushie no matter than he looks good in a flight suit.   
      
   Bush's solution on social security doesn't add up.  You see the people   
   working now pay for the retirement of those who have retired.  If those who   
   work now put money in an individual investment account (which isn’t a bad   
   idea), those who have retired will be short money and it will have to be   
   made up.  Bush says his plan is fiscally neutral, but where does the money   
   come from to pay those already retired?   
      
   In two months since he produced his budget, he's had to increase the   
   projections by $130 billion, and that's without any money for Afghanistan or   
   Iraq.  Seems to me Bush might need a little remedial math.   
      
      
   --   
   Tired of the same rhetoric of lies and deceit?   
   http://www.gentlemanjim.net/   
   "It aint what you don't know that'll hurt ya, it's what you "know" that aint   
   so." -- Will Rogers   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)